From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4D10C352AA for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 14:09:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBD3321906 for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 14:09:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="Ghk4OsGG" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388737AbfJAOJY (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Oct 2019 10:09:24 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-f66.google.com ([209.85.166.66]:34041 "EHLO mail-io1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2388693AbfJAOJY (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Oct 2019 10:09:24 -0400 Received: by mail-io1-f66.google.com with SMTP id q1so48312291ion.1 for ; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 07:09:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8RatxRyirkC/4rfNMMyrhD+loNoE95qLYi7XTzhLkh0=; b=Ghk4OsGG6Oz7tZ5M6eRx1P6XEdLbmrF2aEY6vccsaJberBmlyClMkjTnCDUvfgSoy8 oNi1eKeNRo3+bYcSn0gvIlsZKya2riDbF2MmiNMpb7tr9rGA5cB4bFPRVNLp4ol9yMiW QOU8U5m+QQemvlzF+O/n94HQ8AEX+KydRPxZLaXLyFrOhBDD0qb8JoT7+7HaiAsuSv5X 3yeuYt/vsr2NBT/WYeEUw/mYX2/5yk5mfMBYthUynDq3HY2i1hMmJq87rszhxXsnTUL4 vfcatmG2SXm3yADHfu0rFgwrswiTFriyhC9Ak6WlppWNDCzwuRW1URjT03nKqaIGOZ8v YlgQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=8RatxRyirkC/4rfNMMyrhD+loNoE95qLYi7XTzhLkh0=; b=SjhS6fmYeTu17MNEdZ0Y4Oro5VS9qiRbJwXMI/jNLKfRfWKa1PtbGAHZAIv5LohZ4C DlbvF3Xx3urYAqgCj4Ah7u0FJfAgagJoMIls0dqRpd89XeccHTPgmis1SKw2b2D0t7j4 W/BpUO0gHJD0/+3TUtZ6G+avmtxVfUfdjDVjPcI3AdmNix8qytX8D4Q/ijpfYd7zHjli BZcwT+NEaITlda7vyK204xYJ1ZGU1klgn/rz1Du9/ZQ4EVwJEGjqOi4qkS5tW4QPP9nj ++xn+w78FPF2phef86TAiU3eu6MV5REFMvwceHJ9Yy+vrNIEAiqqJqj2PofwISLlWBBB 2zcg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXWfeKC1IKvPcJ8ZTLW8fCqy2YjE3T0K2wmtupAtpTTGiGqMrfN W2of/WJEc88Gj8/pxeW/xf1OqQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwIU8KTZ8E+y38iJxYiNYbx3DqPrbV92LcVOROG8LhAavzL5GtuetwG67KAKXV7C4rnKXRPBw== X-Received: by 2002:a92:6507:: with SMTP id z7mr23935789ilb.191.1569938961846; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 07:09:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.50] ([65.144.74.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b7sm7177343iod.42.2019.10.01.07.09.20 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 01 Oct 2019 07:09:20 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring: use __kernel_timespec in timeout ABI To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: y2038@lists.linaro.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Viro , =?UTF-8?Q?Stefan_B=c3=bchler?= , Hannes Reinecke , Jackie Liu , Andrew Morton , Hristo Venev , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20190930202055.1748710-1-arnd@arndb.de> From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: <8d5d34da-e1f0-1ab5-461e-f3145e52c48a@kernel.dk> Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2019 08:09:19 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190930202055.1748710-1-arnd@arndb.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On 9/30/19 2:20 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > All system calls use struct __kernel_timespec instead of the old struct > timespec, but this one was just added with the old-style ABI. Change it > now to enforce the use of __kernel_timespec, avoiding ABI confusion and > the need for compat handlers on 32-bit architectures. > > Any user space caller will have to use __kernel_timespec now, but this > is unambiguous and works for any C library regardless of the time_t > definition. A nicer way to specify the timeout would have been a less > ambiguous 64-bit nanosecond value, but I suppose it's too late now to > change that as this would impact both 32-bit and 64-bit users. Thanks for catching that, Arnd. Applied. -- Jens Axboe