From: J Freyensee <why2jjj.linux@gmail.com>
To: Alexey Gladkov <gladkov.alexey@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com>,
Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Security Module <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com>,
Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@gmail.com>,
"Dmitry V . Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
"J . Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Solar Designer <solar@openwall.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 07/10] proc: flush task dcache entries from all procfs instances
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 14:03:29 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8d85ba43-0759-358e-137d-246107bac747@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191225125151.1950142-8-gladkov.alexey@gmail.com>
snip
.
.
.
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
> +static inline void pidns_proc_lock(struct pid_namespace *pid_ns)
> +{
> + down_write(&pid_ns->rw_proc_mounts);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void pidns_proc_unlock(struct pid_namespace *pid_ns)
> +{
> + up_write(&pid_ns->rw_proc_mounts);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void pidns_proc_lock_shared(struct pid_namespace *pid_ns)
> +{
> + down_read(&pid_ns->rw_proc_mounts);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void pidns_proc_unlock_shared(struct pid_namespace *pid_ns)
> +{
> + up_read(&pid_ns->rw_proc_mounts);
> +}
> +#else /* !CONFIG_PROC_FS */
> +
Apologies for my newbie question. I couldn't help but notice all these
function calls are assuming that the parameter struct pid_namespace
*pid_ns will never be NULL. Is that a good assumption?
I don't have the background in this code to answer on my own, but I
thought I'd raise the question.
Thanks,
Jay
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-30 22:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-25 12:51 [PATCH v6 00/10] proc: modernize proc to support multiple private instances Alexey Gladkov
2019-12-25 12:51 ` [PATCH v6 01/10] proc: Rename struct proc_fs_info to proc_fs_opts Alexey Gladkov
2019-12-25 12:51 ` [PATCH v6 02/10] proc: add proc_fs_info struct to store proc information Alexey Gladkov
2019-12-25 12:51 ` [PATCH v6 03/10] proc: move /proc/{self|thread-self} dentries to proc_fs_info Alexey Gladkov
2019-12-25 12:51 ` [PATCH v6 04/10] proc: move hide_pid, pid_gid from pid_namespace " Alexey Gladkov
2019-12-25 12:51 ` [PATCH v6 05/10] proc: add helpers to set and get proc hidepid and gid mount options Alexey Gladkov
2019-12-25 23:06 ` kbuild test robot
2019-12-25 12:51 ` [PATCH v6 06/10] proc: support mounting procfs instances inside same pid namespace Alexey Gladkov
2019-12-25 12:51 ` [PATCH v6 07/10] proc: flush task dcache entries from all procfs instances Alexey Gladkov
2019-12-30 22:03 ` J Freyensee [this message]
2020-01-03 8:56 ` Alexey Gladkov
2019-12-25 12:51 ` [PATCH v6 08/10] proc: instantiate only pids that we can ptrace on 'hidepid=3' mount option Alexey Gladkov
2019-12-25 12:51 ` [PATCH v6 09/10] proc: add option to mount only a pids subset Alexey Gladkov
2019-12-25 23:08 ` kbuild test robot
2019-12-25 12:51 ` [PATCH v6 10/10] docs: proc: add documentation for "hidepid=3" and "pidonly" options and new mount behavior Alexey Gladkov
2020-01-06 15:15 ` [PATCH v6 00/10] proc: modernize proc to support multiple private instances Alexey Dobriyan
2020-01-08 10:37 ` Alexey Gladkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8d85ba43-0759-358e-137d-246107bac747@gmail.com \
--to=why2jjj.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=akinobu.mita@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=danielmicay@gmail.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=gladkov.alexey@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jlayton@poochiereds.net \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=ldv@altlinux.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=solar@openwall.com \
--cc=tixxdz@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).