From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCHSET] non-recursive pathname resolution
Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 08:20:16 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+55aFxyz28_TgT0bRTrcJczFx=fVBxdev4GOccWOdNc-5QNhg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20150505052205.GS889@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150505052205.GS889@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 10:22 PM, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>         My apologies for the patchbomb from hell, but I really think
> it needs a public review.

Aside from the small nits I noted (and I guess I can even live with
the bad label name as long as it never gets resurrected) it looks
good. But I'd obviously like it to get as much testing/beating on as
possible before merging: I'm assuming it will have gone at least
through xfstests etc..

                       Linus