From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-io0-f179.google.com ([209.85.223.179]:44554 "EHLO
        mail-io0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1727254AbeGRXrI (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 18 Jul 2018 19:47:08 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAOssrKf60FHqgG6pB5zOP7iV-qdHdDUODdG7SVpoNh3Pipo=6w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOssrKdqnsPSipweUCers6d2AgJX2aVGQUs1pd7cB79GoSJH1Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180718124340.GS30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <CAOssrKcS+kwK+S1aojhbW_4p8FJLPaafBDqDu89d=F14wT-0rw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180718181252.GU30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <CA+55aFxh62Yttq-W2Cr_YQQ5tAL1xjijjnaz1-zdZNqZPQFM0g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180718194637.GV30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <CA+55aFydd9ji2eJSNVK7Fjpziehvm6fO3b1eTeUAn0L1tk3GmQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180718200411.GW30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <CA+55aFwhnOPO26ubjJ9WhK6YT8JqD5_UTGmNLFWbPdv-On99=w@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180718212205.GY30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20180718212205.GY30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 16:06:48 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+55aFyJJSf0M8ij+Mzea7sFWOuDNcC4eA5KyVYeiKv8HY6LvA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] call_with_creds()
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 2:22 PM Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> Why is counter any better than LSB of a pointer?

Easier nesting, but if you do it with the "surround by a macro" model
I guess you can just save/restore instead (like you did in
call_with_creds).

           Linus