From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C9F9C432C3 for ; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 19:42:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E82B20803 for ; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 19:42:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="jrrHcgnh" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726987AbfLCTl7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Dec 2019 14:41:59 -0500 Received: from mail-io1-f47.google.com ([209.85.166.47]:38002 "EHLO mail-io1-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726564AbfLCTl7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Dec 2019 14:41:59 -0500 Received: by mail-io1-f47.google.com with SMTP id u7so2617249iop.5; Tue, 03 Dec 2019 11:41:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=jTx5dc+vWRjXTXD8ea8S+IkQ3P+N6xf6FOFbA6Qu55s=; b=jrrHcgnhXUWgoj9+ZSOjgJb4brfKOYbkrKYb5diaLu/BTf8PmsF9/f8NgUiTa3fp0l XzePY0ugyf+vqzfzU9PkzE19EfYxW6QCFGdB+JvgZ1b2eQuVHqaiHIgcHL+MJt73E9w5 lRRZuRcTvD3g8wW8Zpg9hYG1Y/YcvC0Jg1quqoERaus3ZRlrGUu9yAPvLdMowCXEAIjs HQSW6nbRr7B/3ZLqpS+NwPDCpzZ/BhoiGqyw+ESVx6r4S6pW9WXztVoI5RGJSm/rhtn2 4TG8Lhny2xOLYA8zv0XVjsVkNJK4hzj1/vD9kCA+0RT6Mk0Cx0/A7uNoFQSLjJZOLRvg pZlg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=jTx5dc+vWRjXTXD8ea8S+IkQ3P+N6xf6FOFbA6Qu55s=; b=FWBd8fJ9YkIJc4Zy7Cx7YY5pLTKcS7iwECGRitkMilwGXYHO07iGj6M4lyL3xdYBK6 CG3/yp6iiePZn519cctyPY7YD7AkB7A81Y/OQ09Yk2AeEeoezgeni3AOuJH+pSlYuovf 0kuAjF5jeTQDRH0wxL8plIPVnuQflhhmF4JdoQoLZyKn601JJuhvnAw5fnxf+0hkaIxN OoauntegWvm41HmypTkOczmU80ftYgCHKod1oSFg+6r2LIVBRfKcQDxH3zI0rf2kS/XR Eq5Z++UhPl3Hcdp78vRwnxDaMvizAE8fSyJWtcyE0k2up6d1MKPqpBqpNGfmiHco4l8+ LwLg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU1nH89I+ethjioO0/Mc2QvPnbUWt9SlapJ/8IRIGPJsfnm+ehu 0jzOkweRY98ikAiFkoA9xnuUqjeB3GQG3wwtABo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwhSOEQxYU6Dlo/9b0oyJWmHuqP00+E4UBzSJdtpsbuP8z60EhXPjwWz94oxTEOHcz/vENiKFMUz0aJvvSJt1g= X-Received: by 2002:a02:c787:: with SMTP id n7mr7202222jao.85.1575402118170; Tue, 03 Dec 2019 11:41:58 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191203051945.9440-1-deepa.kernel@gmail.com> <20191203051945.9440-4-deepa.kernel@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Deepa Dinamani Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2019 11:41:47 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] fs: ceph: Delete timespec64_trunc() usage To: Jeff Layton Cc: Alexander Viro , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux FS-devel Mailing List , Arnd Bergmann , ceph-devel , Ilya Dryomov Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org > Thanks Deepa. We'll plan to take this one in via the ceph tree. Actually, deletion of the timespec64_trunc() will depend on this patch. Can we merge the series through a common tree? Otherwise, whoever takes the [PATCH 6/7] ("fs: Delete timespec64_trunc()") would have to depend on your tree. If you are ok with the change, can you ack it? Thanks, Deepa