From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD10C04AAC for ; Tue, 21 May 2019 00:10:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC69820863 for ; Tue, 21 May 2019 00:10:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="lF7v6AYR" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727116AbfEUAKi (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 May 2019 20:10:38 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-f194.google.com ([209.85.208.194]:36939 "EHLO mail-lj1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726586AbfEUAKi (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 May 2019 20:10:38 -0400 Received: by mail-lj1-f194.google.com with SMTP id h19so14174189ljj.4; Mon, 20 May 2019 17:10:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=+kqkmqnl5eS7FXaCbqzG5wh25R4BINUZlWEMSRIPYsE=; b=lF7v6AYRP7RRcnlOFs8NdGtL1kFEBhadW9xf+b3+e90BrDeBkcwelZx1y4fRw5LN18 xjNWukDaZfAKLRfKG88GIDbvEdMTrlwQYq9n2QPmzI7rh0caWYZruyiQ9JmjtYkCsIxH XJxMLPAby3HrHYF9iCGqVQlXSMG+jkZRg5okctRQd9Gg/idpkVW0A5gFlPst4zuGWKnI a+ziVEHGSUfpf1d0q/40oIlr3ZD8TeKP4tnIFQHH8YQ9ONBD7PSgiYmuv+eEfy6Vv3S5 a4G37zMjaRrM6887wIT/uYvjTpNgxFWyYxEPnFG1YPT5H+Pr28ifE1t/pK0SFGmamxzH snYA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+kqkmqnl5eS7FXaCbqzG5wh25R4BINUZlWEMSRIPYsE=; b=UTPzPQB2otXgMsnv17/xLChy/VO6mJbQ4NW/FkQsGjwDOrJsPBc9XZ+MrlfuiI8Rrd tmqO/l/TggX59Dcm7lsmqql+lppspBKAsmBbvI5aRz+2OTjcyPxhNEcJY+AtQN2I9bGQ ZFcRSvifLv96eHvZsWZqXqgsiTrBivTaLiJ1X7fm6MPZkXnkzwEBE9xL94C6blDe/2vN 3/O6s4EZRTwZfOXl3LG9mff2HHXWIOgv1eCDrn5nHwuN7pF90q4w1gvoYZL2MlwqTq4X PxOqBGge8ohsXTFPfYGiJMDGkcF1mSdIm7gRtdxxL217jZNIn23Ell96EdpJqoJeWcum iS0w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVctaLHKKTVY7NAZaAki0rtgzXgg2XzIS3vRhAPnHZurabz9/N1 dzhVj+heYk8shQ8BTbClBOOkCTMJLcJ/Ae5z6F+zSb6mFeA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy571Wifa8LXTpRRzzPAlFZKUVLmVcUwOLK+7jKkNo8dPRYRyMG5Sus7WKzDTOJOWpgutiH6o2f4SaW2FAiq/w= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:2d02:: with SMTP id t2mr36176225ljt.148.1558397436089; Mon, 20 May 2019 17:10:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190517212448.14256-1-matthewgarrett@google.com> <20190517212448.14256-7-matthewgarrett@google.com> <1558136840.4507.91.camel@linux.ibm.com> <1558387614.4039.84.camel@linux.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <1558387614.4039.84.camel@linux.ibm.com> From: prakhar srivastava Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 17:10:25 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 6/6] IMA: Allow profiles to define the desired IMA template To: Mimi Zohar Cc: Matthew Garrett , linux-integrity , Thiago Jung Bauermann , Roberto Sassu , Mimi Zohar , Dmitry Kasatkin , miklos@szeredi.hu, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Viro Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Hi Matthew,Roberto,Thiago, If you have a branch setup i can then add my patches onto yours? OR We can create a new branch to consolidate all changes? I also sent out v6 of changes it will great if you can take a look. Thanks, Prakhar Srivastava On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 2:27 PM Mimi Zohar wrote: > > On Mon, 2019-05-20 at 13:59 -0700, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 4:47 PM Mimi Zohar wrote: > > > Matthew, I'm going to ask you to separate out this patch from this > > > patch set. Roberto, Thiago, Prakhar, I'm going to ask you to review > > > Matthew's patch. I'm expecting all of the patchsets will be re-posted > > > based on it. > > > > Would you like something along these lines merged before reviewing the > > rest of them, or is adding the ima-vfs-ng template and allowing admins > > to configure it as default sufficient? > > This patch is really independent of the patch set. I'd really like it > as a separate, independent patch in case it needs to be back ported. > It will also make it easier to review. > > Mimi >