From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Weinberger Subject: Re: Tux3 Report: How fast can we fsync? Date: Sat, 2 May 2015 18:30:14 +0200 Message-ID: References: <8f886f13-6550-4322-95be-93244ae61045@phunq.net> <20150430014616.GZ15810@dastard> <81488fcb-b5d5-4761-b8ae-936dce9c1f89@phunq.net> <20150501153855.GB15810@dastard> <55440A56.8000207@phunq.net> <5544F4BA.5060603@ontolab.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Daniel Phillips , David Lang , Dave Chinner , LKML , linux-fsdevel , tux3@tux3.org, "Theodore Ts'o" To: Christian Stroetmann Return-path: Received: from mail-vn0-f46.google.com ([209.85.216.46]:45102 "EHLO mail-vn0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751249AbbEBQaP (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 May 2015 12:30:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5544F4BA.5060603@ontolab.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Christian Stroetmann wrote: > On the 2nd of May 2015 12:26, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > Aloha everybody > >> On Friday, May 1, 2015 6:07:48 PM PDT, David Lang wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, 1 May 2015, Daniel Phillips wrote: >>>> >>>> On Friday, May 1, 2015 8:38:55 AM PDT, Dave Chinner wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Well, yes - I never claimed XFS is a general purpose filesystem. It >>>>> is a high performance filesystem. Is is also becoming more relevant >>>>> to general purpose systems as low cost storage gains capabilities >>>>> that used to be considered the domain of high performance storage... >>>> >>>> >>>> OK. Well, Tux3 is general purpose and that means we care about single >>>> spinning disk and small systems. >>> >>> >>> keep in mind that if you optimize only for the small systems you may not >>> scale as well to the larger ones. >> >> >> Tux3 is designed to scale, and it will when the time comes. I look forward >> to putting Shardmap through its billion file test in due course. However, >> right now it would be wise to stay focused on basic functionality suited to >> a workstation because volunteer devs tend to have those. After that, phones >> are a natural direction, where hard core ACID commit and really smooth file >> ops are particularly attractive. >> > > Has anybody else a deja vu? Yes, the onto-troll strikes again... -- Thanks, //richard