From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20180731161025.189534-1-jannh@google.com> <20180731165112.GJ30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20180731165112.GJ30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> From: Jann Horn Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 21:50:08 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fs: don't let getdents return bogus names To: Al Viro Cc: rth@twiddle.net, ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru, Matt Turner , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, "Eric W. Biederman" , "Theodore Y. Ts'o" , Andreas Dilger , linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, kernel list , Dave Chinner , Pavel Machek Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 6:51 PM Al Viro wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 06:10:27PM +0200, Jann Horn wrote: > > +/* > > + * Most filesystems don't filter out bogus directory entry names, and userspace > > + * can get very confused by such names. Behave as if a low-level IO error had > > + * happened while reading directory entries. > > + */ > > +bool bogus_dirent_name(int *errp, const char *name, int namlen, > > + const char *caller) > > +{ > > + if (namlen == 0) { > > + pr_err_once("%s: filesystem returned bogus empty name\n", > > + caller); > > + *errp = -EUCLEAN; > > + return true; > > + } > > + if (memchr(name, '/', namlen)) { > > + pr_err_once("%s: filesystem returned bogus name '%*pEhp' (contains slash)\n", > > + caller, namlen, name); > > + *errp = -EUCLEAN; > > + return true; > > + } > > + return false; > > +} > > > + if (bogus_dirent_name(&buf->result, name, namlen, __func__)) > > + return -EUCLEAN; > > These calling conventions st^Ware rather suboptimal. First of all, > * none of ->actor() callbacks will ever get called directly. > * there are only 4 callers. 3 of them (all in fs.h) are > of the form return ....->actor(...) == 0; The fourth is > return orig_ctx->actor(orig_ctx, name, namelen, offset, ino, d_type); > in ovl_fill_real(), which itself is an ->actor() callback. > > So all these "return -E..." in the instances are completely pointless; > we should just turn filldir_t into pointer-to-function-returning-bool > and get rid of that boilerplate, rather than adding more to it. Do you want me to try to write a patch that does that change? > Furthermore, who the hell cares which callback has stepped into it? > "The first time it happened from getdents(2) in a 32bit process and > that's all you'll ever get out of me" seems to be less than helpful... Yeah, true. Should I just remove the method name from the pr_err_once? Or should I also use one of the _ratelimited things and print multiple messages? > And frankly, I would prefer > buf->result = check_dirent_name(name, namelen); > if (unlikely(buf->result)) > return false; > making that thing return -EUCLEAN or 0. Quite possibly - inlining it > as well... I guess that would conform to normal kernel coding standards a bit better. Thanks for the quick feedback!