From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED0C0CA9EA0 for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 14:35:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4C432184C for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 14:35:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=paul-moore-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@paul-moore-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="waU2hphe" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731965AbfJVOfJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Oct 2019 10:35:09 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-f193.google.com ([209.85.208.193]:46565 "EHLO mail-lj1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725788AbfJVOfI (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Oct 2019 10:35:08 -0400 Received: by mail-lj1-f193.google.com with SMTP id d1so17426598ljl.13 for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 07:35:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paul-moore-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=BYDYFcrmZnPsA3wNhTxT7xGFYYOAAOh9Vy6atnzjLi0=; b=waU2hpheX/TrBzV4vEgbgCSQZavQHRKBJyf3We9Oa6EO8pqIzKn/x0RR8yVxAJtXif o5wV6xEZj6OmkN+gsNlUIE3SlrYWpP6FnQR91Mkel7Yc31DCKJCqxLVac9zBJWfrqAig AnSHfrBGwdsobSt4I2ex8H13Pw5VSILZpZP+0W9/3gOphmAg2NFATMuQ5R5i0fTwxMHa mhvxoAYbxgHGF854kilNFHJ9Ees7EW7wGZpA08bLcn+TV5//6T+8yvwOpxDYnmTocS9P uzp8bmCNZ414ELtk0X90GazUNbo+1P3jEAIUYD/1uT+dLLXF/88QLkWvgCN4cSI9DcT+ xtYw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=BYDYFcrmZnPsA3wNhTxT7xGFYYOAAOh9Vy6atnzjLi0=; b=Pe/6nYCnEuYd7z5qq6jUTqp2GschmeMgBL1W4Ib42jilbSIkM+nHDhOMEE7uRQxOwV dJpjPhb2lbgnhjqoefBFQg6jCny1peKw+MN4DGvsAFbFNumdej7ub97EQEzdnwSkSOLO yLSWDdvXJ+ozxrv1IznVnmEUcdm351KNNfoqIPGrYaYrogv/elsCyjdnJVKjPP5fbKZH CF+5Kgo/4k3peA8bIlWg28WS4lzWX7Vm3QgqIoSd/T+oAclnItc2VAStUNnYeuhrCeG2 RIM0sd6LrgkhVE+uAzK8FXZGLG1bPXcfK7Tv7jRMypq7z+zm/P1st9kaNHqBRq7/uNMP Cl1A== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVzq3Zi+++n1q6bZAUvH7Kw6zMEJYTehhtrJASFdoezh2mZ083S nHLMUPfuSwQ/JKkQs5NYzK0wLzQTSvAMiZSLBAgp X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxWl+VJRD6qwDm3xnMIjUjL7khHepxMxomEkV8ULQEiUK2eWkxiHdieTFB5R0wrN5wi4Wq/lLVlZuZfm59x+Po= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:3505:: with SMTP id z5mr11579413ljz.126.1571754905226; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 07:35:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <214163d11a75126f610bcedfad67a4d89575dc77.1568834525.git.rgb@redhat.com> <20191019013904.uevmrzbmztsbhpnh@madcap2.tricolour.ca> <20191021213824.6zti5ndxu7sqs772@madcap2.tricolour.ca> <20191021235734.mgcjotdqoe73e4ha@madcap2.tricolour.ca> <20191022142716.sgxcmc27w4uaqh3u@madcap2.tricolour.ca> In-Reply-To: <20191022142716.sgxcmc27w4uaqh3u@madcap2.tricolour.ca> From: Paul Moore Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 10:34:54 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH ghak90 V7 20/21] audit: add capcontid to set contid outside init_user_ns To: Richard Guy Briggs Cc: containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Linux-Audit Mailing List , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, LKML , netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, sgrubb@redhat.com, omosnace@redhat.com, dhowells@redhat.com, simo@redhat.com, Eric Paris , Serge Hallyn , ebiederm@xmission.com, nhorman@tuxdriver.com, Dan Walsh , mpatel@redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 10:27 AM Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > I'd like your perspective on how the capcontid feature was implemented > (aside from the proc/netlink api issue which was intended to be > consistent across loginuid/sessionid/contid/capcontid). Do you see this > feature as potentially solving the nested container issue in child user > namespaces? The patchset is a bit messy at this point in the stack due to the "fixup!" confusion and a few other things which I already mentioned so I don't really want to comment too much on that until I can see everything in a reasonable patch stack. Let's leave that for the next draft. -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com