From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75086C47082 for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 19:11:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5787B610A8 for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 19:11:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233674AbhEZTMi (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 May 2021 15:12:38 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41460 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233554AbhEZTMc (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 May 2021 15:12:32 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x62e.google.com (mail-ej1-x62e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95F1DC061756 for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 12:10:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x62e.google.com with SMTP id h20so2754800ejg.1 for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 12:10:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paul-moore-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=IMN6ChejNXJFYXToAoXG4lV7NHrdkhgPtkU3r94Vvkg=; b=rrEpfN2eSUWFwTnN59H3JQhAB5eFLKAJCg2tSavS1ZnxCW60lgzt33IwObabQh2Fiu R8otedpGlExOIZh5g2t3KeDEHthFgNq1Tw5Tl27NvK/Ol5bCJAu0NtWwcAaDGALwhO/A bOBmrwLBshkHZB8xUhrMI1yIP2wvejtGOyxHPdwD85dbPnHecSxw/UJV9E6KSGPlbGNn YFMesNoT/acoDSs5GvcbN7ez6HpdH129AZcY1OlbklrTQPR5ANzn7wdWVaXScc9ZcKDd d2DctUe3Woib8fuZANmiFmn3S+7eNKMuWsFxjXbOWuVZQSJC/jKuj3i0PmeX6GWLwsFj wxjA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=IMN6ChejNXJFYXToAoXG4lV7NHrdkhgPtkU3r94Vvkg=; b=qnnKECrgJ1TWxnvEWay8YamdvhH7fqZsl+gL7Pz9zUqY5S9CWYaqt3jnYtJtR6l5XE clN8utA+bfqRy+0+015316UJSd7YY3fBG7U2Xr7Sw0HoAiFmCzZ6nhadjIvOdOhctluA Ajb/lsAHIVtCTR4XLU40Qp4+SOWMlDTNf6WwsM+mCIv/efVCVcVQ2es1EcZDBEg7eNmN 3ApqyX2c6Bi4Ri3NYWLIzxopvFBDiZls+ekH8XKkCaolxMjA3ybNSlYoega228YzINne BNJS25oyDr5Zzl51wYPISx+FS2XWwI0KHrwIV9YHiQgX3qfQNTth/mvE9rBIsd1jXI/s 6lJg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530HzMRRcQ/p6m6haAgDych7F3EIw9ULB2wOCZ+ixJNfWipzXbbg YNOZ+q8oxCN9NZzTQMakVJTsadQ59yKtJMgP6VbY X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw5Uo6wSn4k4zz/jz3Ayrk4WGYUWInTcmg7vYqy+K7NbwQFUmlxJqbAcL8Cf1k2FEX+enTA83rXl0PTreAKR3g= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:7e0f:: with SMTP id e15mr34549005ejr.398.1622056258166; Wed, 26 May 2021 12:10:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <162163367115.8379.8459012634106035341.stgit@sifl> In-Reply-To: From: Paul Moore Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 15:10:46 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] Add LSM access controls and auditing to io_uring To: Jeff Moyer Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-audit@redhat.com, io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi , Jens Axboe , Alexander Viro Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 3:06 PM Jeff Moyer wrote: > Paul Moore writes: > > > On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 10:59 AM Jeff Moyer wrote: > >> Paul Moore writes: > >> > >> > Also, any pointers to easy-to-run io_uring tests would be helpful. I > >> > am particularly interested in tests which make use of the personality > >> > option, share urings across process boundaries, and make use of the > >> > sqpoll functionality. > >> > >> liburing contains a test suite: > >> https://git.kernel.dk/cgit/liburing/ > >> > >> You can run it via 'make runtests'. > > > > Thanks Jeff, I'll take a look. Quick question as I start sifting > > through the tests, are there any tests in here which share a single > > ring across process boundaries? > > Yes. At the very least, this one: > > test/across-fork.c Great, thanks! -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com