linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
To: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [v4 PATCH 04/11] mm: vmscan: remove memcg_shrinker_map_size
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 13:06:28 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHbLzkpPBGxzpyvxDaMpjiL9T6eeS0B9QJSkChAK-YbPWSMY6A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <af9204cb-2298-ee7c-5307-295d33befd8a@virtuozzo.com>

On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 12:36 AM Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com> wrote:
>
> On 22.01.2021 02:06, Yang Shi wrote:
> > Both memcg_shrinker_map_size and shrinker_nr_max is maintained, but actually the
> > map size can be calculated via shrinker_nr_max, so it seems unnecessary to keep both.
> > Remove memcg_shrinker_map_size since shrinker_nr_max is also used by iterating the
> > bit map.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  mm/vmscan.c | 16 +++++++---------
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> > index d3f3701dfcd2..40e7751ef961 100644
> > --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> > @@ -185,8 +185,7 @@ static LIST_HEAD(shrinker_list);
> >  static DECLARE_RWSEM(shrinker_rwsem);
> >
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
> > -
> > -static int memcg_shrinker_map_size;
> > +static int shrinker_nr_max;
> >
> >  static void free_shrinker_map_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
> >  {
> > @@ -248,7 +247,7 @@ int alloc_shrinker_maps(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> >               return 0;
> >
> >       down_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
> > -     size = memcg_shrinker_map_size;
> > +     size = (shrinker_nr_max / BITS_PER_LONG + 1) * sizeof(unsigned long);
> >       for_each_node(nid) {
> >               map = kvzalloc_node(sizeof(*map) + size, GFP_KERNEL, nid);
> >               if (!map) {
> > @@ -266,10 +265,11 @@ int alloc_shrinker_maps(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> >  static int expand_shrinker_maps(int new_id)
> >  {
> >       int size, old_size, ret = 0;
> > +     int new_nr_max = new_id + 1;
> >       struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
> >
> > -     size = DIV_ROUND_UP(new_id + 1, BITS_PER_LONG) * sizeof(unsigned long);
> > -     old_size = memcg_shrinker_map_size;
> > +     size = (new_nr_max / BITS_PER_LONG + 1) * sizeof(unsigned long);
> > +     old_size = (shrinker_nr_max / BITS_PER_LONG + 1) * sizeof(unsigned long);
> >
> >       if (size <= old_size)
> >               return 0;
>
> This looks a BUG:
>
> expand_shrinker_maps(id == 1)
> {
>         old_size = 64;
>         size = 64;
>
>         ===>return 0 and shrinker_nr_max remains 0.
> }
>
> Then shrink_slab_memcg() misses this shrinker since shrinker_nr_max == 0.

Yes, thanks for catching this. It should be fixed by the below patch:

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index bb254d39339f..47010a69b400 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ static int expand_shrinker_info(int new_id)
        old_d_size = shrinker_nr_max * sizeof(atomic_long_t);
        old_size = old_m_size + old_d_size;
        if (size <= old_size)
-               return 0;
+               goto out;

        if (!root_mem_cgroup)
                goto out;

>
> >
> > @@ -286,9 +286,10 @@ static int expand_shrinker_maps(int new_id)
> >                       goto out;
> >               }
> >       } while ((memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(NULL, memcg, NULL)) != NULL);
> > +
> >  out:
> >       if (!ret)
> > -             memcg_shrinker_map_size = size;
> > +             shrinker_nr_max = new_nr_max;
> >
> >       return ret;
> >  }
> > @@ -321,7 +322,6 @@ void set_shrinker_bit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int nid, int shrinker_id)
> >  #define SHRINKER_REGISTERING ((struct shrinker *)~0UL)
> >
> >  static DEFINE_IDR(shrinker_idr);
> > -static int shrinker_nr_max;
> >
> >  static int prealloc_memcg_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker)
> >  {
> > @@ -338,8 +338,6 @@ static int prealloc_memcg_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker)
> >                       idr_remove(&shrinker_idr, id);
> >                       goto unlock;
> >               }
> > -
> > -             shrinker_nr_max = id + 1;
> >       }
> >       shrinker->id = id;
> >       ret = 0;
> >
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-25 21:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-21 23:06 [v4 PATCH 0/11] Make shrinker's nr_deferred memcg aware Yang Shi
2021-01-21 23:06 ` [v4 PATCH 01/11] mm: vmscan: use nid from shrink_control for tracepoint Yang Shi
2021-01-21 23:06 ` [v4 PATCH 02/11] mm: vmscan: consolidate shrinker_maps handling code Yang Shi
2021-01-21 23:06 ` [v4 PATCH 03/11] mm: vmscan: use shrinker_rwsem to protect shrinker_maps allocation Yang Shi
2021-01-21 23:06 ` [v4 PATCH 04/11] mm: vmscan: remove memcg_shrinker_map_size Yang Shi
2021-01-25  8:35   ` Kirill Tkhai
2021-01-25 21:06     ` Yang Shi [this message]
2021-01-21 23:06 ` [v4 PATCH 05/11] mm: memcontrol: rename shrinker_map to shrinker_info Yang Shi
2021-01-21 23:06 ` [v4 PATCH 06/11] mm: vmscan: use a new flag to indicate shrinker is registered Yang Shi
2021-01-21 23:06 ` [v4 PATCH 07/11] mm: vmscan: add per memcg shrinker nr_deferred Yang Shi
2021-01-25  9:31   ` Kirill Tkhai
2021-01-25 21:08     ` Yang Shi
2021-01-21 23:06 ` [v4 PATCH 08/11] mm: vmscan: use per memcg nr_deferred of shrinker Yang Shi
2021-01-25  9:35   ` Kirill Tkhai
2021-01-25 21:16     ` Yang Shi
2021-01-21 23:06 ` [v4 PATCH 09/11] mm: vmscan: don't need allocate shrinker->nr_deferred for memcg aware shrinkers Yang Shi
2021-01-21 23:06 ` [v4 PATCH 10/11] mm: memcontrol: reparent nr_deferred when memcg offline Yang Shi
2021-01-21 23:06 ` [v4 PATCH 11/11] mm: vmscan: shrink deferred objects proportional to priority Yang Shi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAHbLzkpPBGxzpyvxDaMpjiL9T6eeS0B9QJSkChAK-YbPWSMY6A@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=shy828301@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=ktkhai@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).