From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4670C04AAA for ; Thu, 2 May 2019 17:44:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 806AC20652 for ; Thu, 2 May 2019 17:44:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726442AbfEBRoT (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 May 2019 13:44:19 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-f195.google.com ([209.85.167.195]:44603 "EHLO mail-oi1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726427AbfEBRoT (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 May 2019 13:44:19 -0400 Received: by mail-oi1-f195.google.com with SMTP id t184so2317154oie.11 for ; Thu, 02 May 2019 10:44:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=A/BTpe1GCpx8WOaWkORwszZW4OhHJBOv4flBT0vFDKI=; b=K+zYbDVEHGsN7LT+JkyeVoHRoDKq1uv+m0exMBCnN6O6EZ0vMWIWtQO3uuFJukbIYj NCEUjBPo7B4Wl8vaP2U+UFkh5HBDEpwhr4f+PZzHaxi1gbLeJ+3TqytDcCq5lkiNj8no IcGf/DKV4cy1y3R+X5HDHsZyKgRXYcsm36DHcIVg7zU7mNHdOrVm1TvYAElhqAB8ihWI n3wd/fswLTYgtyClrEIOlIY9AzLxG9Havmtk4bhel0QhmeBsqVezl7Gkh+0QGlD9kpki 7smri0QSZOzORkMsGRVmZciO57Co9g+ujB49xFWCqYCUv1yUySINlUpQLfw4TWoLHp+n uN9w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX41kbkaudWPNJNweiFNcrHpexOZxNH9nadaOiiebiiE/qB3wuY GTD9JIdAFaoqagV47k6Ani+1jz7WwfHVVz94EV/cyQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzkCKVtwDFTAmTjZnr+9E8F6X9oBSJfpx707teMwX2ZIYfEr+1PfRcpNtXqB1Leic/fKOicG15VnaqrRwMWYU0= X-Received: by 2002:aca:47c8:: with SMTP id u191mr1503973oia.72.1556819058630; Thu, 02 May 2019 10:44:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20161205151933.GA17517@fieldses.org> <20161205162559.GB17517@fieldses.org> <266c571f-e4e2-7c61-5ee2-8ece0c2d06e9@web.de> <20161206185806.GC31197@fieldses.org> <87bm0l4nra.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> <875zqt4igg.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> <8f3ba729-ed44-7bed-5ff8-b962547e5582@math.utexas.edu> In-Reply-To: <8f3ba729-ed44-7bed-5ff8-b962547e5582@math.utexas.edu> From: Andreas Gruenbacher Date: Thu, 2 May 2019 19:44:07 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] overlayfs: ignore empty NFSv4 ACLs in ext4 upperdir To: "Goetz, Patrick G" Cc: NeilBrown , Amir Goldstein , "J. Bruce Fields" , Miklos Szeredi , =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_Gr=C3=BCnbacher?= , Patrick Plagwitz , "linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org" , Linux NFS list , Linux FS-devel Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2 May 2019 at 19:27, Goetz, Patrick G wrote: > On 5/1/19 10:57 PM, NeilBrown wrote: > > Support some day support for nfs4 acls were added to ext4 (not a totally > > ridiculous suggestion). We would then want NFS to allow it's ACLs to be > > copied up. > > Is there some reason why there hasn't been a greater effort to add NFSv4 > ACL support to the mainstream linux filesystems? I have to support a > hybrid linux/windows environment and not having these ACLs on ext4 is a > daily headache for me. The patches for implementing that have been rejected over and over again, and nobody is working on them anymore. Andreas