From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEFE6C433DF for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 07:38:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9830D2068E for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 07:38:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.b="T/QAfqa4" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728528AbgFOHiB (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jun 2020 03:38:01 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59018 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728492AbgFOHiA (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jun 2020 03:38:00 -0400 Received: from mail-yb1-xb42.google.com (mail-yb1-xb42.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b42]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAC40C061A0E for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 00:38:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yb1-xb42.google.com with SMTP id m16so8526310ybf.4 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 00:38:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=OR0mfp69BO369dwMXiG/0IV7r83mKSvkOO+HBHsDV1U=; b=T/QAfqa4gFf2yPcnbt8MpH2hlEvC+xI2OD12t7di66bI1nfIJIzk+a+tCDwCLV8YPn BccJQNU5tQCdz8kxQHRhSAQmRfOaCS23oCHN8QHk53uiXkmEzU937zEX7hw2JXA13fLh H6AvPzEbMLFvJRql+xRU19vf1Ve9o1Z8CbYHM= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=OR0mfp69BO369dwMXiG/0IV7r83mKSvkOO+HBHsDV1U=; b=Qe4LXOzAoq3iNr4Sm/3WdsB7y+knzZbBg+V+zfWejMAONJrOl0TPuNkUwgV41t4xst tbdCovbLUs5ZYtzhORJW2C3JvzNLAFsmabwhd1l4CSlj4/G0SaO3Q0DE9vR+NHLvpWV8 8wWAx5d8GPrzbzB50ZVHXS/ILaYHGxxtJuIMSWOPqvuosLjwa/gK2ABYmwWuLAMoQbIF C9m7RC9M4l1CoFBmAoZZWezEJEB3dE/yuGvvzOVedUFsT+Z4p0JvU5me8eyTy0PG7bf2 pjAf6Ex+r5hrsx+yeJAgWephjoVvO/ZSP1mCcLYHNvEq8rgjvEyyqNiT8zPWAr7lW/VH UvDw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530FqgucWsv813r+CGmgkBPzQ/5N4TPBlrY3p4daiXsBm/H0p4t7 njJlaIf+OnfwTi6UtKGOgIhh9yP2+a0QUdyTXWhirA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyyI2Fd9JGRDW2DjCfgSu7Y51EYv2sGWjoCOWb8tbaxFYxhbnljZkgtyjnD4MYgui6HMB1R8+4Pylx55gLLtpE= X-Received: by 2002:a25:b8c:: with SMTP id 134mr44867223ybl.428.1592206679759; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 00:37:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200601053214.201723-1-chirantan@chromium.org> <20200610092744.140038-1-chirantan@chromium.org> In-Reply-To: <20200610092744.140038-1-chirantan@chromium.org> From: Chirantan Ekbote Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 16:37:48 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] RFC: fuse: Call security hooks on new inodes To: Miklos Szeredi Cc: Vivek Goyal , Stefan Hajnoczi , Linux FS Devel , virtio-fs-list , Dylan Reid , Suleiman Souhlal Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Friendly ping. Are there any concerns with this patch? I know I probably need to split it up into 2 patches: one that adds the flag and one that implements support. Since v2 adds a new flag to the init_out struct I'd really like to get this merged upstream as carrying it locally would effectively mean forking the protocol. Thanks, Chirantan