From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
To: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: kuznet@virtuozzo.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] fuse: Solve request_find() bottleneck
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 17:04:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJfpegt60Bcmu+fHRTL-HE-Uw5rvP3Nb_yuzfpX02E9Z8ECbdg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8222c235-ff07-b16b-3389-0b9780145abd@virtuozzo.com>
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 2:08 PM, Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com> wrote:
> 2 weeks passed, so ping.
>
> Miklos, any reaction on this?
>
> Thanks,
> Kirill
>
> On 11.09.2018 13:11, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We noticed the performance bottle neck in FUSE running our
>> Virtuozzo storage over rdma. On some types of workload
>> we observe 20% of time spent in request_find() in profiler.
>> This function is iterating over long list of requests, and it
>> scales bad.
>>
>> The patch introduces hash table to reduce the number
>> of iterations, we do in this function. Also, algorithm
>> of generating IDs for interrupt requests is changed,
>> simplified request_find() function and killed
>> fuse_req::intr_unique field.
Concept looks good. Will review details...
Thanks,
Miklos
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-24 21:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-11 10:11 [PATCH 0/3] fuse: Solve request_find() bottleneck Kirill Tkhai
2018-09-11 10:11 ` [PATCH 1/3] fuse: Change interrupt requests allocation algorhythm Kirill Tkhai
2018-09-11 10:12 ` [PATCH 2/3] fuse: Kill fuse_req::intr_unique Kirill Tkhai
2018-09-11 10:12 ` [PATCH 3/3] fuse: Use hash table to link processing request Kirill Tkhai
2018-09-25 9:08 ` Miklos Szeredi
2018-09-25 9:35 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-09-24 12:08 ` [PATCH 0/3] fuse: Solve request_find() bottleneck Kirill Tkhai
2018-09-24 15:04 ` Miklos Szeredi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJfpegt60Bcmu+fHRTL-HE-Uw5rvP3Nb_yuzfpX02E9Z8ECbdg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=ktkhai@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=kuznet@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).