From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FA00C433E3 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 09:14:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C6F721775 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 09:14:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=szeredi.hu header.i=@szeredi.hu header.b="OA5nN++w" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728077AbgGTJO2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jul 2020 05:14:28 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35744 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728068AbgGTJO1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jul 2020 05:14:27 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x644.google.com (mail-ej1-x644.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::644]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0BA0C0619D2 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 02:14:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x644.google.com with SMTP id n22so14347332ejy.3 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 02:14:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=szeredi.hu; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=HT/w08b/F9buVSOqAYhSLIx8cTyL3aCPU2r2G861cY4=; b=OA5nN++wZuWJJmmyx6R6FCVHjYMTUBPL34nidvIoel4g6ktGaqlxKyNUr3TPMsS0G1 WMKFOvmMewDMMGRlkrDEAJbdX8m+wMCrV/aR38H0o6Qv5up7tgByjO8gEjbG4O++Ei0X p6p202E4/NMGCsVYHR6/5M7nRkSOppJyGugeQ= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=HT/w08b/F9buVSOqAYhSLIx8cTyL3aCPU2r2G861cY4=; b=SxqLeO4TSqVdOwNvumAOe39iFVU4rxvkriAkYXkGQhj1DWilLfu2RHSiWe9WWxDtFd ZOl+JjyG+ssOd+SYbXeLTtiCgtNHw5O/nqaRjXL4YtGEDMIIK8y+UKilTPiYP89IHtAi G2Le+v/HbvdIIUBYbWwDxchmfxGK/8bzzwYehfuCfAG+PwXWRpI7OTEyIiwAM9wAgpXl PM/RrWW+hc5VcLptkBaim26PojA+oxHUELRIRV1etFJcVfVH+RODIn4kUjQlVRrJWeAO TsgjlozETUjpTvWiMqlybZEahz+7ZlRQQCb4G1gBDUF63+9R8zbN3DkS1FUtazaYQ4ms 1+XQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53090w3n7atSTx2OimwOSazVGa8GTpMDkj7jOKp8gZchUTBItFuq JbMLQfaPCOLS0WbGd+iYUQ4dTZxcQvdSjl/Voce30A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxszkVSu9gAvj7UPfh6XgM9/UkJcRFmVPWwmNhBdDMlwZnGAQ0eHlvBlk6A+DyrwtJSxMkAfA+e0xBj5htEy5s= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4f09:: with SMTP id t9mr19330994eju.110.1595236465448; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 02:14:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200710115805.4478-2-mszeredi@redhat.com> <20200716002733.3ECE62075B@mail.kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20200716002733.3ECE62075B@mail.kernel.org> From: Miklos Szeredi Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 11:14:14 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] fuse: ignore 'data' argument of mount(..., MS_REMOUNT) To: Sasha Levin Cc: Miklos Szeredi , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Stefan Priebe , stable Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="000000000000dbb28b05aadbeeff" Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org --000000000000dbb28b05aadbeeff Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 2:27 AM Sasha Levin wrote: > > Hi > > [This is an automated email] > > This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag > fixing commit: c30da2e981a7 ("fuse: convert to use the new mount API"). > > The bot has tested the following trees: v5.7.8, v5.4.51. > > v5.7.8: Build OK! > v5.4.51: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: > 7f5d38141e309 ("new primitive: __fs_parse()") > 82995cc6c5ae4 ("libceph, rbd, ceph: convert to use the new mount API") > d7167b149943e ("fs_parse: fold fs_parameter_desc/fs_parameter_spec") > > > NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream. > > How should we proceed with this patch? Conflict resolution is trivial. Thanks, Miklos --000000000000dbb28b05aadbeeff Content-Type: text/x-patch; charset="US-ASCII"; name="merge.patch" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="merge.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-ID: X-Attachment-Id: f_kcuakxlf0 ZGlmZiAtLWNjIGZzL2Z1c2UvaW5vZGUuYwppbmRleCAxNmFlYzMyZjdmM2QsYmEyMDFiZjVmZmFk Li4wMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAKLS0tIGEvZnMvZnVzZS9pbm9kZS5jCisrKyBiL2ZzL2Z1c2UvaW5vZGUu YwpAQEAgLTQ3Myw3IC00NzcsMTQgKzQ3MywxNCBAQEAgc3RhdGljIGludCBmdXNlX3BhcnNlX3Bh cmFtKHN0cnVjdCBmc19jCiAgCXN0cnVjdCBmdXNlX2ZzX2NvbnRleHQgKmN0eCA9IGZjLT5mc19w cml2YXRlOwogIAlpbnQgb3B0OwogIAorIAkvKgorIAkgKiBJZ25vcmUgb3B0aW9ucyBjb21pbmcg ZnJvbSBtb3VudChNU19SRU1PVU5UKSBmb3IgYmFja3dhcmQKKyAJICogY29tcGF0aWJpbGl0eS4K KyAJICovCisgCWlmIChmYy0+cHVycG9zZSA9PSBGU19DT05URVhUX0ZPUl9SRUNPTkZJR1VSRSkK KyAJCXJldHVybiAwOworIAogLQlvcHQgPSBmc19wYXJzZShmYywgZnVzZV9mc19wYXJhbWV0ZXJz LCBwYXJhbSwgJnJlc3VsdCk7CiArCW9wdCA9IGZzX3BhcnNlKGZjLCAmZnVzZV9mc19wYXJhbWV0 ZXJzLCBwYXJhbSwgJnJlc3VsdCk7CiAgCWlmIChvcHQgPCAwKQogIAkJcmV0dXJuIG9wdDsKICAK --000000000000dbb28b05aadbeeff--