From: Miklos Szeredi <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: Dan Schatzberg <email@example.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Kernel Team <Kernelemail@example.com>,
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fuse: enable caching of symlinks
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 10:29:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJfpegugRrA7-U4+6zRWZBEuTiYa=GgLqCeJWvhBz15-5szubQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 11:33 PM, Dan Schatzberg <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 9/27/18, 9:59 AM, "Miklos Szeredi" <email@example.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 3:52 PM, Dan Schatzberg <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>> FUSE file reads are cached in the page cache, but symlink reads are
>>> not. This patch enables FUSE READLINK operations to be cached which
>>> can improve performance of some FUSE workloads.
>>> In particular, I'm working on a FUSE filesystem for access to source
>>> code and discovered that about a 10% improvement to build times is
>>> achieved with this patch (there are a lot of symlinks in the source
>>> Please provide feedback, I'm looking to flesh this out more.
>> Need to think about how/when to invalidate the cached symlink
>> contents. I think treating it like metadata (i.e. look at
>> attr_timeout for validity) would be the simplest.
> Any further thoughts on this? Just so I can confirm my understanding,
> the attached patch will unconditionally cache READLINK responses
> However, based on the entry timeout provided by the LOOKUP response,
> Userspace can decide to invalidate this by providing a different inode on
> a subsequent LOOKUP (e.g. during fuse_dentry_revalidate())
> Would you like there to be a way to invalidate the cached symlink without
> changing the inode via LOOKUP?
No, that would make no sense, since symlink contents are not mutable.
This was just a braino on my part.
I still worry about backward compatibility, though. So we should add
a flag to negotiate symlink caching in with the INIT request.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-10 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-27 13:52 [PATCH] fuse: enable caching of symlinks Dan Schatzberg
2018-09-27 13:58 ` Miklos Szeredi
2018-10-02 21:33 ` Dan Schatzberg
2018-10-10 8:29 ` Miklos Szeredi [this message]
2018-10-09 14:29 ` Dan Schatzberg
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).