From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75A1CC3A59F for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 09:28:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4B5B2189D for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 09:28:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=szeredi.hu header.i=@szeredi.hu header.b="Hc9GLAgO" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726283AbfH2J2j (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Aug 2019 05:28:39 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-f67.google.com ([209.85.166.67]:34445 "EHLO mail-io1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726232AbfH2J2j (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Aug 2019 05:28:39 -0400 Received: by mail-io1-f67.google.com with SMTP id s21so5648202ioa.1 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 02:28:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=szeredi.hu; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=v06lta4MYVBJBZLQ73bBpIez3Zzb0/6n6ZDJgeZvvFA=; b=Hc9GLAgOOnaaXsF3NrbM7AecX7f3q0LEmVqWdNl+cCygzK/RxeejM05rD+PoBYvpNy iCfIvK00i3nYnz/7hEF1IyoD0raYoTA0Fi7pIXSNsQiydr+b2RWwANqNTLEGdoi4TVze EI0HrSen2CJeJvMGU2pb8OzX9tm5amIQIkLoI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=v06lta4MYVBJBZLQ73bBpIez3Zzb0/6n6ZDJgeZvvFA=; b=QUcygq2sOaMH0RkjhwYc+9ShPaVSL/O7N/Bqxik+2ws3cPJli9bWr5bSbeT+ldXORr NMCVe3RkBAoS44aAJaJJNCmqVK+646QxoFlE+MxkdPmSTknRAinBqhektqstm7kXtZm9 QJLJluZh28UQwOymgmyb/Uoyzpr8sppEAd7BF7Wn5Xn54F+lLGGRdphxPYzsOw4CY1ld W31G8Omeb5VQR/V0MRLSB6rxqapIEmsTW87GO28w9E18VmjZo1jm1xW1qo9X8gdmWERn +V771fq3Arx9yI40Ikpe17ejRKiTWjSko9oFZAIwMdkQyh7g3Yx+b32KHtCLBHkZ2MZe 58oA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVbv1EFJAp48nPDk/O5CHVRdd2Wo16rB4jXiujd/5SKFLiWLsx7 zPEFHEDJyPNtsrGhUkMRp40QqO53+1MQ+owMDPt2VA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyUavfINYtqJHGpZUBR9A9V8dAVHmilYmO0JxPFl0AJag7dkVSKSrPI4+FtMTzlVFjVPwtJnqsyT6kSq+5gC8c= X-Received: by 2002:a5e:da48:: with SMTP id o8mr593380iop.252.1567070918305; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 02:28:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190821173742.24574-1-vgoyal@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20190821173742.24574-1-vgoyal@redhat.com> From: Miklos Szeredi Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 11:28:27 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/13] virtio-fs: shared file system for virtual machines To: Vivek Goyal Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtio-fs@redhat.com, Stefan Hajnoczi , "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 7:38 PM Vivek Goyal wrote: > > Hi, > > Here are the V3 patches for virtio-fs filesystem. This time I have > broken the patch series in two parts. This is first part which does > not contain DAX support. Second patch series will contain the patches > for DAX support. > > I have also dropped RFC tag from first patch series as we believe its > in good enough shape that it should get a consideration for inclusion > upstream. Pushed out to git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mszeredi/fuse.git#for-next Major changes compared to patchset: - renamed to "virtiofs". Filesystem names don't usually have underscore before "fs" postfix. - removed option parsing completely. Virtiofs config is fixed to "-o rootmode=040000,user_id=0,group_id=0,allow_other,default_permissions". Does this sound reasonable? There are miscellaneous changes, so needs to be thoroughly tested. I think we also need something in "Documentation/filesystems/virtiofs.rst" which describes the design (how request gets to userspace and back) and how to set up the server, etc... Stefan, Vivek can you do something like that? Thanks, Miklos