From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 062D8C433DB for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 05:40:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAE7864DFF for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 05:40:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230255AbhBQFkA (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Feb 2021 00:40:00 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:52358 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229885AbhBQFj7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Feb 2021 00:39:59 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B710264DEC; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 05:39:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1613540358; bh=NbAmmaGQmfZWMm1BXQVzI0umy9Eh1JXd1YaKOjPeNhw=; h=In-Reply-To:References:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=GCxQmX2RiMPgd1bkNN4owBaeyRM8OYxDSUvIVLmDWut06EtLz3Tax0o+epduqmLwl BhPjd4I08C8usQuaBrmlUNRajWg2o7qTViC65mQ+AErin5T1L3g+Zuq3lTR53U7zbO RflmF9l99/h/lGYsrpsTdndX5aRFHPJY3iQCRM1uTiy5BDnomV2ZSTlEms31yB+3X3 BU2rqDvtDz8/5n9LLS00gQHhzQQ+UTjDb1uXuvO4UDlsZUxOZ+PT47O/4BRKCZ+slw OngllKYCi2jRz9Ij6DO9Nlpl0FNGzSco0fjN7aVmKo1OYTTqAfoBqkqZVk8k5OU3ob UiBST3BO7+t5w== Received: by mail-ot1-f52.google.com with SMTP id c16so11120625otp.0; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 21:39:18 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530mN2htvZttjGLEU1yS1uhVU4sU8a4tF73NSe4wfyXZ35K+ILJ4 FeWyl+kbNydS1p/GPlJdmF9IGvnj82x5kRUYiRM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwDq71zLUcnG1gLUuvuBxrgIhyJajYbuwWxi3suqIL2IrLuCHbyuuIb8Ergaz3UxGo+TUbG/gYQ08y47/4TTtE= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1146:: with SMTP id x6mr12150898otq.120.1613540358062; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 21:39:18 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:ac9:13e5:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 21:39:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <78a7f3ec-f5c2-071a-506c-b19b21b9b04c@gmail.com> References: <20210216223306.47693-1-hyeongseok@gmail.com> <20210216223306.47693-2-hyeongseok@gmail.com> <78a7f3ec-f5c2-071a-506c-b19b21b9b04c@gmail.com> From: Namjae Jeon Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 14:39:17 +0900 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] exfat: add initial ioctl function To: Hyeongseok Kim Cc: Chaitanya Kulkarni , "namjae.jeon@samsung.com" , "sj1557.seo@samsung.com" , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org 2021-02-17 9:33 GMT+09:00, Hyeongseok Kim : > On 2/17/21 9:17 AM, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote: >> On 2/16/21 16:13, Hyeongseok Kim wrote: >>> Sorry, I don't understand exactly. >>> You're saying that these 2 patch should be merged to a single patch? >>> Would it be better? >> I think so unless there is a specific reason for this to keep it >> isolated. >> > The reason was just that I think it seems better to seperate ioctl > initializing and adding specific ioctl functionality. > Anyway, I got it. > > Namjae, Hi Hyeongseok, > Do you have any other opinion about this? I also think this patch should be combined with the 2/2 patch. > If you agree, I'll merge these as one. Yep, Agreed. Please do that:) Thanks! > >