linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@umich.edu>
To: Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com>
Cc: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.de>,
	Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
	Steve French <sfrench@samba.org>,
	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>,
	Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@netapp.com>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
	Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>,
	Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>,
	Luis Lozano <llozano@chromium.org>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	ceph-devel <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	CIFS <linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org>,
	samba-technical <samba-technical@lists.samba.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-nfs <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8] vfs: fix copy_file_range regression in cross-fs copies
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 12:13:21 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAN-5tyFEaU_-dQJWni566hDKA2YMvt889KeuR0uzpG1tFb6MUw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7c12e6a3-e4a6-5210-1b57-09072eac3270@oracle.com>

On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 11:03 AM <dai.ngo@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 2/23/21 7:29 AM, dai.ngo@oracle.com wrote:
> >
> > On 2/23/21 2:32 AM, Luis Henriques wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 08:25:27AM -0800, dai.ngo@oracle.com wrote:
> >>> On 2/22/21 2:24 AM, Luis Henriques wrote:
> >>>> A regression has been reported by Nicolas Boichat, found while
> >>>> using the
> >>>> copy_file_range syscall to copy a tracefs file.  Before commit
> >>>> 5dae222a5ff0 ("vfs: allow copy_file_range to copy across devices") the
> >>>> kernel would return -EXDEV to userspace when trying to copy a file
> >>>> across
> >>>> different filesystems.  After this commit, the syscall doesn't fail
> >>>> anymore
> >>>> and instead returns zero (zero bytes copied), as this file's
> >>>> content is
> >>>> generated on-the-fly and thus reports a size of zero.
> >>>>
> >>>> This patch restores some cross-filesystem copy restrictions that
> >>>> existed
> >>>> prior to commit 5dae222a5ff0 ("vfs: allow copy_file_range to copy
> >>>> across
> >>>> devices").  Filesystems are still allowed to fall-back to the VFS
> >>>> generic_copy_file_range() implementation, but that has now to be done
> >>>> explicitly.
> >>>>
> >>>> nfsd is also modified to fall-back into generic_copy_file_range()
> >>>> in case
> >>>> vfs_copy_file_range() fails with -EOPNOTSUPP or -EXDEV.
> >>>>
> >>>> Fixes: 5dae222a5ff0 ("vfs: allow copy_file_range to copy across
> >>>> devices")
> >>>> Link:
> >>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20210212044405.4120619-1-drinkcat@chromium.org/__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!P1UWThiSkxbjfjFQWNYJmCxGEkiLFyvHjH6cS-G1ZTt1z-TeqwGQgQmi49dC6w$
> >>>> Link:
> >>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/CANMq1KDZuxir2LM5jOTm0xx*BnvW=ZmpsG47CyHFJwnw7zSX6Q@mail.gmail.com/__;Kw!!GqivPVa7Brio!P1UWThiSkxbjfjFQWNYJmCxGEkiLFyvHjH6cS-G1ZTt1z-TeqwGQgQmgCmMHzA$
> >>>> Link:
> >>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20210126135012.1.If45b7cdc3ff707bc1efa17f5366057d60603c45f@changeid/__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!P1UWThiSkxbjfjFQWNYJmCxGEkiLFyvHjH6cS-G1ZTt1z-TeqwGQgQmzqItkrQ$
> >>>> Reported-by: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.de>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> Changes since v7
> >>>> - set 'ret' to '-EOPNOTSUPP' before the clone 'if' statement so
> >>>> that the
> >>>>     error returned is always related to the 'copy' operation
> >>>> Changes since v6
> >>>> - restored i_sb checks for the clone operation
> >>>> Changes since v5
> >>>> - check if ->copy_file_range is NULL before calling it
> >>>> Changes since v4
> >>>> - nfsd falls-back to generic_copy_file_range() only *if* it gets
> >>>> -EOPNOTSUPP
> >>>>     or -EXDEV.
> >>>> Changes since v3
> >>>> - dropped the COPY_FILE_SPLICE flag
> >>>> - kept the f_op's checks early in generic_copy_file_checks,
> >>>> implementing
> >>>>     Amir's suggestions
> >>>> - modified nfsd to use generic_copy_file_range()
> >>>> Changes since v2
> >>>> - do all the required checks earlier, in generic_copy_file_checks(),
> >>>>     adding new checks for ->remap_file_range
> >>>> - new COPY_FILE_SPLICE flag
> >>>> - don't remove filesystem's fallback to generic_copy_file_range()
> >>>> - updated commit changelog (and subject)
> >>>> Changes since v1 (after Amir review)
> >>>> - restored do_copy_file_range() helper
> >>>> - return -EOPNOTSUPP if fs doesn't implement CFR
> >>>> - updated commit description
> >>>>
> >>>>    fs/nfsd/vfs.c   |  8 +++++++-
> >>>>    fs/read_write.c | 49
> >>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> >>>>    2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> >>>> index 04937e51de56..23dab0fa9087 100644
> >>>> --- a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> >>>> +++ b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> >>>> @@ -568,6 +568,7 @@ __be32 nfsd4_clone_file_range(struct nfsd_file
> >>>> *nf_src, u64 src_pos,
> >>>>    ssize_t nfsd_copy_file_range(struct file *src, u64 src_pos,
> >>>> struct file *dst,
> >>>>                     u64 dst_pos, u64 count)
> >>>>    {
> >>>> +    ssize_t ret;
> >>>>        /*
> >>>>         * Limit copy to 4MB to prevent indefinitely blocking an nfsd
> >>>> @@ -578,7 +579,12 @@ ssize_t nfsd_copy_file_range(struct file *src,
> >>>> u64 src_pos, struct file *dst,
> >>>>         * limit like this and pipeline multiple COPY requests.
> >>>>         */
> >>>>        count = min_t(u64, count, 1 << 22);
> >>>> -    return vfs_copy_file_range(src, src_pos, dst, dst_pos, count, 0);
> >>>> +    ret = vfs_copy_file_range(src, src_pos, dst, dst_pos, count, 0);
> >>>> +
> >>>> +    if (ret == -EOPNOTSUPP || ret == -EXDEV)
> >>>> +        ret = generic_copy_file_range(src, src_pos, dst, dst_pos,
> >>>> +                          count, 0);
> >>>> +    return ret;
> >>>>    }
> >>>>    __be32 nfsd4_vfs_fallocate(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh
> >>>> *fhp,
> >>>> diff --git a/fs/read_write.c b/fs/read_write.c
> >>>> index 75f764b43418..5a26297fd410 100644
> >>>> --- a/fs/read_write.c
> >>>> +++ b/fs/read_write.c
> >>>> @@ -1388,28 +1388,6 @@ ssize_t generic_copy_file_range(struct file
> >>>> *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
> >>>>    }
> >>>>    EXPORT_SYMBOL(generic_copy_file_range);
> >>>> -static ssize_t do_copy_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t
> >>>> pos_in,
> >>>> -                  struct file *file_out, loff_t pos_out,
> >>>> -                  size_t len, unsigned int flags)
> >>>> -{
> >>>> -    /*
> >>>> -     * Although we now allow filesystems to handle cross sb copy,
> >>>> passing
> >>>> -     * a file of the wrong filesystem type to filesystem driver
> >>>> can result
> >>>> -     * in an attempt to dereference the wrong type of
> >>>> ->private_data, so
> >>>> -     * avoid doing that until we really have a good reason.  NFS
> >>>> defines
> >>>> -     * several different file_system_type structures, but they all
> >>>> end up
> >>>> -     * using the same ->copy_file_range() function pointer.
> >>>> -     */
> >>>> -    if (file_out->f_op->copy_file_range &&
> >>>> -        file_out->f_op->copy_file_range ==
> >>>> file_in->f_op->copy_file_range)
> >>>> -        return file_out->f_op->copy_file_range(file_in, pos_in,
> >>>> -                               file_out, pos_out,
> >>>> -                               len, flags);
> >>>> -
> >>>> -    return generic_copy_file_range(file_in, pos_in, file_out,
> >>>> pos_out, len,
> >>>> -                       flags);
> >>>> -}
> >>>> -
> >>>>    /*
> >>>>     * Performs necessary checks before doing a file copy
> >>>>     *
> >>>> @@ -1427,6 +1405,25 @@ static int generic_copy_file_checks(struct
> >>>> file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
> >>>>        loff_t size_in;
> >>>>        int ret;
> >>>> +    /*
> >>>> +     * Although we now allow filesystems to handle cross sb copy,
> >>>> passing
> >>>> +     * a file of the wrong filesystem type to filesystem driver
> >>>> can result
> >>>> +     * in an attempt to dereference the wrong type of
> >>>> ->private_data, so
> >>>> +     * avoid doing that until we really have a good reason.  NFS
> >>>> defines
> >>>> +     * several different file_system_type structures, but they all
> >>>> end up
> >>>> +     * using the same ->copy_file_range() function pointer.
> >>>> +     */
> >>>> +    if (file_out->f_op->copy_file_range) {
> >>>> +        if (file_in->f_op->copy_file_range !=
> >>>> +            file_out->f_op->copy_file_range)
> >>>> +            return -EXDEV;
> >>>> +    } else if (file_in->f_op->remap_file_range) {
> >>>> +        if (file_inode(file_in)->i_sb != file_inode(file_out)->i_sb)
> >>>> +            return -EXDEV;
> >>> I think this check is redundant, it's done in vfs_copy_file_range.
> >>> If this check is removed then the else clause below should be removed
> >>> also. Once this check and the else clause are removed then might as
> >>> well move the the check of copy_file_range from here to
> >>> vfs_copy_file_range.
> >>>
> >> I don't think it's really redundant, although I agree is messy due to
> >> the
> >> fact we try to clone first instead of copying them.
> >>
> >> So, in the clone path, this is the only place where we return -EXDEV if:
> >>
> >> 1) we don't have ->copy_file_range *and*
> >> 2) we have ->remap_file_range but the i_sb are different.
> >>
> >> The check in vfs_copy_file_range() is only executed if:
> >>
> >> 1) we have *valid* ->copy_file_range ops and/or
> >> 2) we have *valid* ->remap_file_range
> >>
> >> So... if we remove the check in generic_copy_file_checks() as you
> >> suggest
> >> and:
> >> - we don't have ->copy_file_range,
> >> - we have ->remap_file_range but
> >> - the i_sb are different
> >>
> >> we'll return the -EOPNOTSUPP (the one set in line "ret =
> >> -EOPNOTSUPP;" in
> >> function vfs_copy_file_range() ) instead of -EXDEV.
> >
> > Yes, this is the different.The NFS code handles both -EOPNOTSUPP and
> > -EXDEVV by doing generic_copy_file_range.  Do any other consumers of
> > vfs_copy_file_range rely on -EXDEV and not -EOPNOTSUPP and which is
> > the correct error code for this case? It seems to me that -EOPNOTSUPP
> > is more appropriate than EXDEV when (sb1 != sb2).
>
> So with the current patch, for a clone operation across 2 filesystems:

Wait, I can't get passed "a clone operation across 2 filesystems", I
thought there are not any options. It's not allowed? Then we go do try
the copy. Those are two different steps so errors code might be
different.

>    . if src and dst filesystem support both copy_file_range and
>      map_file_range then the code returns -ENOTSUPPORT.
>
>    . if the filesystems only support map_file_range then the
>      code returns -EXDEV
>
> This seems confusing, shouldn't only 1 error code returned for this case?
>
> -Dai
>
> >
> >>
> >> But I may have got it all wrong.  I've looked so many times at this code
> >> that I'm probably useless at finding problems in it :-)
> >
> > You're not alone, we all try to do the right thing :-)
> >
> > -Dai
> >
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> --
> >> Luís
> >>
> >>> -Dai
> >>>
> >>>> +    } else {
> >>>> +                return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >>>> +    }
> >>>> +
> >>>>        ret = generic_file_rw_checks(file_in, file_out);
> >>>>        if (ret)
> >>>>            return ret;
> >>>> @@ -1495,6 +1492,7 @@ ssize_t vfs_copy_file_range(struct file
> >>>> *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
> >>>>        file_start_write(file_out);
> >>>> +    ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >>>>        /*
> >>>>         * Try cloning first, this is supported by more file
> >>>> systems, and
> >>>>         * more efficient if both clone and copy are supported (e.g.
> >>>> NFS).
> >>>> @@ -1513,9 +1511,10 @@ ssize_t vfs_copy_file_range(struct file
> >>>> *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
> >>>>            }
> >>>>        }
> >>>> -    ret = do_copy_file_range(file_in, pos_in, file_out, pos_out, len,
> >>>> -                flags);
> >>>> -    WARN_ON_ONCE(ret == -EOPNOTSUPP);
> >>>> +    if (file_out->f_op->copy_file_range)
> >>>> +        ret = file_out->f_op->copy_file_range(file_in, pos_in,
> >>>> +                              file_out, pos_out,
> >>>> +                              len, flags);
> >>>>    done:
> >>>>        if (ret > 0) {
> >>>>            fsnotify_access(file_in);

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-02-23 17:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 136+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-12  4:43 [PATCH 0/6] Add generated flag to filesystem struct to block copy_file_range Nicolas Boichat
2021-02-12  4:44 ` [PATCH 1/6] fs: Add flag to file_system_type to indicate content is generated Nicolas Boichat
2021-02-12  7:46   ` Greg KH
2021-02-12  8:20     ` Nicolas Boichat
2021-02-12  8:37       ` Greg KH
2021-02-12 15:33         ` Ian Lance Taylor
2021-02-12 15:45           ` Greg KH
2021-02-12 15:59             ` Ian Lance Taylor
2021-02-12 16:28               ` Greg KH
2021-02-12 20:22                 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2021-02-12 23:03             ` Dave Chinner
2021-02-12 23:07               ` Ian Lance Taylor
2021-02-12 23:27                 ` Dave Chinner
2021-02-12 23:54                   ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-02-15  0:38                     ` Dave Chinner
2021-02-15  1:12                       ` Ian Lance Taylor
2021-02-15  1:25                         ` Nicolas Boichat
2021-02-15  5:56                           ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-15  8:30                           ` Greg KH
2021-02-12  8:22     ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-12  8:39       ` Greg KH
2021-02-12 12:05         ` Luis Henriques
2021-02-12 12:18           ` Greg KH
2021-02-12 12:41             ` Luis Henriques
2021-02-12 14:11               ` Greg KH
2021-02-12 15:01                 ` Luis Henriques
2021-02-15  6:12               ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-15 10:39                 ` Luis Henriques
2021-02-15 12:22                   ` Luis Henriques
2021-02-15 14:23                     ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-15 14:51                       ` Luis Henriques
2021-02-15 15:43                       ` [PATCH v2] vfs: prevent copy_file_range to copy across devices Luis Henriques
2021-02-15 16:02                         ` Trond Myklebust
2021-02-16  0:25                           ` Steve French
2021-02-15 16:34                         ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-15 16:53                           ` Trond Myklebust
2021-02-15 17:24                             ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-15 18:57                               ` Trond Myklebust
2021-02-15 19:43                                 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-16 11:17                                   ` Luis Henriques
2021-02-16 11:28                                     ` gregkh
2021-02-16 12:01                                       ` Luis Henriques
2021-02-16 12:08                                         ` Greg KH
2021-02-16 13:51                                     ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-16 16:42                                       ` Luis Henriques
2021-02-16 17:44                                         ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-16 18:55                                           ` Luis Henriques
2021-02-16 19:20                                             ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-16 19:27                                               ` Anna Schumaker
2021-02-16 19:31                                                 ` Steve French
2021-02-16 19:40                                                   ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-16 21:15                                                     ` Steve French
2021-02-17  8:08                                                       ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-17 17:26                                                         ` [PATCH v3] vfs: fix copy_file_range regression in cross-fs copies Luis Henriques
2021-02-17 20:47                                                           ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-18  0:56                                                           ` Nicolas Boichat
2021-02-18  5:32                                                           ` Olga Kornievskaia
2021-02-18  6:47                                                             ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-18 16:28                                                               ` Olga Kornievskaia
2021-02-18  7:43                                                           ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-02-18  0:50                                                         ` [PATCH v2] vfs: prevent copy_file_range to copy across devices Andreas Dilger
2021-02-18  7:34                                                           ` gregkh
2021-02-16 18:54                                       ` Andreas Dilger
2021-02-17  4:45                         ` Nicolas Boichat
2021-02-18  7:42                         ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-02-18  9:10                           ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-18 10:29                             ` Luis Henriques
2021-02-18 12:15                               ` Luis Henriques
2021-02-18 12:49                                 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-18 14:36                                   ` [PATCH v4] vfs: fix copy_file_range regression in cross-fs copies Luis Henriques
2021-02-18 14:58                                     ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-18 15:17                                       ` [PATCH v5] " Luis Henriques
2021-02-18 15:53                                         ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-18 16:35                                           ` Luis Henriques
2021-02-18 17:18                                             ` [PATCH v6] " Luis Henriques
2021-02-19 21:18                                               ` Olga Kornievskaia
2021-02-19 21:52                                                 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-21 19:58                                                 ` [PATCH v7] " Luis Henriques
2021-02-22  3:00                                                   ` Nicolas Boichat
2021-02-22 10:24                                                   ` [PATCH v8] " Luis Henriques
2021-02-22 10:46                                                     ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-22 16:25                                                     ` dai.ngo
2021-02-23 10:32                                                       ` Luis Henriques
2021-02-23 15:28                                                         ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-23 15:29                                                         ` dai.ngo
2021-02-23 16:02                                                           ` dai.ngo
2021-02-23 16:47                                                             ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-23 16:57                                                               ` dai.ngo
     [not found]                                                                 ` <e3eed18b-fc7e-e687-608b-7f662017329c@oracle.com>
2021-02-23 17:33                                                                   ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-24  0:13                                                                     ` dai.ngo
2021-02-23 17:56                                                                 ` Luis Henriques
2021-02-23 17:13                                                             ` Olga Kornievskaia [this message]
2021-02-24  1:00                                                     ` Olga Kornievskaia
2021-02-24 10:23                                                       ` Luis Henriques
2021-02-24 10:44                                                         ` Nicolas Boichat
2021-04-09  5:23                                                           ` Nicolas Boichat
2021-04-09 13:39                                                             ` Luis Henriques
2021-04-09 13:50                                                               ` Amir Goldstein
2021-04-23  4:40                                                                 ` Nicolas Boichat
2021-05-03  8:54                                                                   ` Luis Henriques
2021-05-10  4:59                                                                     ` Amir Goldstein
2021-05-10  9:10                                                                       ` Luis Henriques
2021-02-24 14:23                                                     ` [PATCH] copy_file_range.2: Kernel v5.12 updates Luis Henriques
2021-02-24 16:10                                                       ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-25 10:21                                                         ` Luis Henriques
2021-02-26 10:13                                                           ` Alejandro Colomar (man-pages)
2021-02-26 10:34                                                             ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-26 11:15                                                               ` Alejandro Colomar (man-pages)
2021-02-26 13:59                                                                 ` Jeff Layton
2021-02-26 21:26                                                                   ` Alejandro Colomar (man-pages)
2021-02-26 22:18                                                         ` Alejandro Colomar (man-pages)
2021-02-27  5:41                                                           ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-27 12:20                                                             ` Alejandro Colomar (man-pages)
2021-02-27 13:49                                                               ` [RFC v2] copy_file_range.2: Update cross-filesystem support for 5.12 Alejandro Colomar
2021-02-27 16:00                                                                 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-27 23:08                                                             ` [PATCH] copy_file_range.2: Kernel v5.12 updates Steve French
2021-02-28  7:35                                                               ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-28 22:25                                                                 ` Steve French
2021-03-01  6:18                                                                   ` Amir Goldstein
2021-03-01 14:41                                                       ` [RFC v3] copy_file_range.2: Update cross-filesystem support for 5.12 Alejandro Colomar
2021-03-01 14:58                                                         ` Amir Goldstein
2021-03-04  9:38                                                       ` [RFC v4] " Alejandro Colomar
2021-03-04 17:13                                                         ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-03-04 18:24                                                           ` Alejandro Colomar (man-pages)
2021-03-04 23:50                                                             ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-02-24  7:15                                     ` [PATCH v4] vfs: fix copy_file_range regression in cross-fs copies Amir Goldstein
2021-02-24  8:30                                       ` Petr Vorel
2021-02-18 20:41                             ` [PATCH v2] vfs: prevent copy_file_range to copy across devices Steve French
2021-02-12 23:15       ` [PATCH 1/6] fs: Add flag to file_system_type to indicate content is generated Dave Chinner
2021-02-12  7:54   ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-12  4:44 ` [PATCH 2/6] proc: Add FS_GENERATED_CONTENT to filesystem flags Nicolas Boichat
2021-02-12  4:44 ` [PATCH 6/6] vfs: Disallow copy_file_range on generated file systems Nicolas Boichat
2021-02-12  4:53   ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-02-12  4:59     ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-02-12  5:24       ` Nicolas Boichat
2021-02-14 23:09 ` [PATCH 0/6] Add generated flag to filesystem struct to block copy_file_range Al Viro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAN-5tyFEaU_-dQJWni566hDKA2YMvt889KeuR0uzpG1tFb6MUw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=aglo@umich.edu \
    --cc=adilger@dilger.ca \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=anna.schumaker@netapp.com \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dai.ngo@oracle.com \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=drinkcat@chromium.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=iant@google.com \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=lhenriques@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llozano@chromium.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=samba-technical@lists.samba.org \
    --cc=sfrench@samba.org \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v8] vfs: fix copy_file_range regression in cross-fs copies' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).