From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/8] fanotify: add BUILD_BUG_ON() to count the bits of fanotify constants
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 13:24:54 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOQ4uxgUJ9vJ75tqXozcDrfnjQw1s11rfk_UAd=guP3WUTjrEQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181004084141.GA11529@quack2.suse.cz>
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 11:41 AM Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
>
> On Thu 04-10-18 00:25:37, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> > Also define the FANOTIFY_EVENT_FLAGS consisting of the extra flags
> > FAN_ONDIR and FAN_ON_CHILD.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
> ...
> > /* Events that may be reported to user */
> > #define FANOTIFY_OUTGOING_EVENTS (FANOTIFY_EVENTS | \
> > FANOTIFY_PERM_EVENTS | \
> > FAN_Q_OVERFLOW)
> >
> > +#define ALL_FANOTIFY_EVENT_BITS (FANOTIFY_EVENTS | \
> > + FANOTIFY_PERM_EVENTS | \
> > + FANOTIFY_EVENT_FLAGS | \
> > + FANOTIFY_OUTGOING_EVENTS)
> > +
>
> No point in repeating FANOTIFY_EVENTS | FANOTIFY_PERM_EVENTS here when
> they are already included on FANOTIFY_OUTGOING_EVENTS, right? I can fix
> that up myself, just wanted to point it out.
It's fine to me.
Thanks,
Amir.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-04 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-03 21:25 [PATCH v3 0/8] New fanotify event info API Amir Goldstein
2018-10-03 21:25 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] fanotify: fix collision of internal and uapi mark flags Amir Goldstein
2018-10-03 21:25 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] fsnotify: generalize handling of extra event flags Amir Goldstein
2018-10-03 21:25 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] fanotify: simplify handling of FAN_ONDIR Amir Goldstein
2018-10-03 21:25 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] fanotify: deprecate uapi FAN_ALL_* constants Amir Goldstein
2018-10-03 21:25 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] fsnotify: convert runtime BUG_ON() to BUILD_BUG_ON() Amir Goldstein
2018-10-03 21:25 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] fanotify: add BUILD_BUG_ON() to count the bits of fanotify constants Amir Goldstein
2018-10-04 8:41 ` Jan Kara
2018-10-04 10:24 ` Amir Goldstein [this message]
2018-10-03 21:25 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] fanotify: support reporting thread id instead of process id Amir Goldstein
2018-10-04 8:46 ` Jan Kara
2018-10-04 10:27 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-10-11 10:16 ` Jan Kara
2018-10-12 2:43 ` Nixiaoming
2018-10-16 12:06 ` Jan Kara
2018-10-03 21:25 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] fsnotify: optimize away srcu_read_lock() for events on directories Amir Goldstein
2018-10-04 9:09 ` Jan Kara
2018-10-04 10:30 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-10-04 11:26 ` Jan Kara
2018-10-04 22:05 ` Amir Goldstein
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAOQ4uxgUJ9vJ75tqXozcDrfnjQw1s11rfk_UAd=guP3WUTjrEQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).