From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EE0EC4320D for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 12:00:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CA8621D7E for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 12:00:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="QQq5D1Go" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2405184AbfIYMAA (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Sep 2019 08:00:00 -0400 Received: from mail-yw1-f67.google.com ([209.85.161.67]:39419 "EHLO mail-yw1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2389932AbfIYL77 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Sep 2019 07:59:59 -0400 Received: by mail-yw1-f67.google.com with SMTP id n11so1900153ywn.6 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 04:59:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=gB/Mpmzw04vdh4Grpk8wkJgP2t28rwM7GudBbJELUO4=; b=QQq5D1Goxsu3vgmj5zuiTnU6b9nBrdhfXSG1M9UG1kU1qRQstFSTQGd/PDO0wtFuW5 0m6vpRQGoLBYn2GfampXyA82E3gzW0gAnkXsfqIGpXGpNp933gVyZ2GjOUEm6441OVyy Ym5zkg+Q8TpUqMxSVJIQyAgEpjXZ24qHQC6a8o55ulLkESO7yNRcOsEo2iSi7fcOsILR Bd4ccPVPRwpn+gFS7QkPYQ/fI2TV5W0x2K0Qsp+28LTADMN2XgDK5GmcTOu+gmLFHreu uhMOwDDbNls6Sq5r/WfIa+H8x1htdXdjHya+kPc9IoziABxjY0YXWwSUGnDuKrilE0H8 iygA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=gB/Mpmzw04vdh4Grpk8wkJgP2t28rwM7GudBbJELUO4=; b=QHEuloS5CLhmxp6caTLkd669t13cOuf0bg1X2fvOsgYv2lHauMdjadhkL4jhu4tIT0 a5JGixHXtqw6U8Kep6CycXxb1joX/B7LHYTzYl2B04a0ORj8MU9V06lriXaQ3RWyhDZH Vi6yFRA9TJ0gTB+wapFDCD4wwKA8/4DjfMfTyoK+B0GNRjitsVxhWlf7lWsn44sANDjR 6ZNxG26uLl3PHtcQ/SvQyzABIP3gCg0+Lek3WB88lYou+Q9NoQER6nCGpE6acUpmt7uH xjl2A6NdVeIkY+5p6y1IqKXnHhVBkM1rkRc32867GOai1EaUGb3noN/9J2KncdZe07Yd 31gg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWuT8+/JYYII0tlLjtR5F+RoOg0yT8Run+2arZxi8VwHFDxhjsj RHVYXdrcZagaeIRSbnYgyjhAomIlGQs4GskHkxs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxfrYLeiPVRtlrCvaLScgRPVGNgbqqQB157v0Ezuz7mHSpk2dgL3A7IOMGYmUYm4Dhllc65MMMzw8Tp1K4cieY= X-Received: by 2002:a81:ef09:: with SMTP id o9mr5545566ywm.31.1569412798684; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 04:59:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190914161622.GS1131@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20190914170146.GT1131@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20190914200412.GU1131@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20190915005046.GV1131@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20190915160236.GW1131@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20190921140731.GQ1131@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20190921140731.GQ1131@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> From: Amir Goldstein Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:59:47 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: Possible FS race condition between iterate_dir and d_alloc_parallel To: Al Viro Cc: Linus Torvalds , "zhengbin (A)" , Jan Kara , Andrew Morton , linux-fsdevel , "zhangyi (F)" , renxudong1@huawei.com, Hou Tao Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 5:34 PM Al Viro wrote: > > FWIW, #next.dcache has the straight conversion to hlist. Note that this: @@ -108,8 +108,8 @@ struct dentry { struct list_head d_lru; /* LRU list */ wait_queue_head_t *d_wait; /* in-lookup ones only */ }; - struct list_head d_child; /* child of parent list */ - struct list_head d_subdirs; /* our children */ + struct hlist_node d_sibling; /* child of parent list */ + struct hlist_head d_children; /* our children */ Changes the 'standard' struct dentry size from 192 to 184. Does that matter for cache line alignment? Should struct dentry be ____cacheline_aligned? Thanks, Amir.