From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/16] fanotify: merge duplicate events on parent and child
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 14:14:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOQ4uxiXbGF+RRUmnP4Sbub+3TxEavmCvi0AYpwHuLepqexdCA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200226091804.GD10728@quack2.suse.cz>
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 11:18 AM Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
>
> On Mon 17-02-20 15:14:47, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> > With inotify, when a watch is set on a directory and on its child, an
> > event on the child is reported twice, once with wd of the parent watch
> > and once with wd of the child watch without the filename.
> >
> > With fanotify, when a watch is set on a directory and on its child, an
> > event on the child is reported twice, but it has the exact same
> > information - either an open file descriptor of the child or an encoded
> > fid of the child.
> >
> > The reason that the two identical events are not merged is because the
> > tag used for merging events in the queue is the child inode in one event
> > and parent inode in the other.
> >
> > For events with path or dentry data, use the dentry instead of inode as
> > the tag for event merging, so that the event reported on parent will be
> > merged with the event reported on the child.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
>
> I agree that reporting identical event twice seems wasteful but ...
>
> > @@ -312,7 +313,12 @@ struct fanotify_event *fanotify_alloc_event(struct fsnotify_group *group,
> > if (!event)
> > goto out;
> > init: __maybe_unused
> > - fsnotify_init_event(&event->fse, inode);
> > + /*
> > + * Use the dentry instead of inode as tag for event queue, so event
> > + * reported on parent is merged with event reported on child when both
> > + * directory and child watches exist.
> > + */
> > + fsnotify_init_event(&event->fse, (void *)dentry ?: inode);
>
> ... this seems quite ugly and also previously we could merge 'inode' events
> with others and now we cannot because some will carry "dentry where event
> happened" and other ones "inode with watch" as object identifier. So if you
> want to do this, I'd use "inode where event happened" as object identifier
> for fanotify.
<scratch head> Why didn't I think of that?...
I suppose you mean to just use:
fsnotify_init_event(&event->fse, id);
>
> Hum, now thinking about this, maybe we could clean this up even a bit more.
> event->inode is currently used only by inotify and fanotify for merging
> purposes. Now inotify could use its 'wd' instead of inode with exactly the
> same results, fanotify path or fid check is at least as strong as the inode
> check. So only for the case of pure "inode" events, we need to store inode
> identifier in struct fanotify_event - and we can do that in the union with
> struct path and completely remove the 'inode' member from fsnotify_event.
> Am I missing something?
That generally sounds good and I did notice it is strange that wd is not
being compared.
However, I think I was worried that comparing fid+name (in following patches)
would be more expensive than comparing dentry (or object inode) as a
"rule out first" in merge, so I preferred to keep the tag/dentry/id comparison
for fanotify_fid case.
Given this analysis (and assuming it is correct), would you like me to
just go a head
with the change suggested above? or anything beyond that?
Thanks,
Amir.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-26 12:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-17 13:14 [PATCH v2 00/16] Fanotify event with name info Amir Goldstein
2020-02-17 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 01/16] fsnotify: tidy up FS_ and FAN_ constants Amir Goldstein
2020-02-17 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 02/16] fsnotify: factor helpers fsnotify_dentry() and fsnotify_file() Amir Goldstein
2020-02-25 13:46 ` Jan Kara
2020-02-25 14:27 ` Amir Goldstein
2020-02-26 13:59 ` Jan Kara
2020-02-17 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 03/16] fsnotify: funnel all dirent events through fsnotify_name() Amir Goldstein
2020-02-17 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 04/16] fsnotify: use helpers to access data by data_type Amir Goldstein
2020-02-17 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 05/16] fsnotify: simplify arguments passing to fsnotify_parent() Amir Goldstein
2020-02-19 10:50 ` kbuild test robot
2020-02-19 11:11 ` Amir Goldstein
2020-02-17 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 06/16] fsnotify: pass dentry instead of inode for events possible on child Amir Goldstein
2020-02-17 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 07/16] fsnotify: replace inode pointer with tag Amir Goldstein
2020-02-26 8:20 ` Jan Kara
2020-02-26 9:34 ` Amir Goldstein
2020-02-26 8:52 ` Jan Kara
2020-02-17 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 08/16] fanotify: merge duplicate events on parent and child Amir Goldstein
2020-02-26 9:18 ` Jan Kara
2020-02-26 12:14 ` Amir Goldstein [this message]
2020-02-26 14:38 ` Jan Kara
2021-01-22 13:59 ` fanotify_merge improvements Amir Goldstein
2021-01-23 13:30 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-01-25 13:01 ` Jan Kara
2021-01-26 16:21 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-01-27 11:24 ` Jan Kara
2021-01-27 12:57 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-01-27 15:15 ` Jan Kara
2021-01-27 18:03 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-01-28 10:27 ` Jan Kara
2021-01-28 18:50 ` Amir Goldstein
2020-02-17 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 09/16] fanotify: fix merging marks masks with FAN_ONDIR Amir Goldstein
2020-02-17 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 10/16] fanotify: send FAN_DIR_MODIFY event flavor with dir inode and name Amir Goldstein
2020-02-17 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 11/16] fanotify: prepare to encode both parent and child fid's Amir Goldstein
2020-02-26 10:23 ` Jan Kara
2020-02-26 11:53 ` Amir Goldstein
2020-02-26 17:07 ` Jan Kara
2020-02-26 17:50 ` Amir Goldstein
2020-02-27 9:06 ` Amir Goldstein
2020-02-27 11:27 ` Jan Kara
2020-02-27 12:12 ` Amir Goldstein
2020-02-27 13:30 ` Jan Kara
2020-02-27 14:06 ` Amir Goldstein
2020-03-01 16:26 ` Amir Goldstein
2020-03-05 15:49 ` Jan Kara
2020-03-06 11:19 ` Amir Goldstein
2020-03-08 7:29 ` Amir Goldstein
2020-03-18 17:51 ` Jan Kara
2020-03-18 18:50 ` Amir Goldstein
2020-03-19 9:30 ` Jan Kara
2020-03-19 10:07 ` Amir Goldstein
2020-03-30 19:29 ` Amir Goldstein
2020-02-27 11:01 ` Jan Kara
2020-02-17 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 12/16] fanotify: record name info for FAN_DIR_MODIFY event Amir Goldstein
2020-02-17 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 13/16] fanotify: report " Amir Goldstein
2020-02-19 9:43 ` kbuild test robot
2020-02-19 10:17 ` kbuild test robot
2020-02-19 11:22 ` Amir Goldstein
2020-04-16 12:16 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2020-04-20 15:53 ` Jan Kara
2020-04-20 18:45 ` Amir Goldstein
2020-04-20 18:47 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2020-02-17 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 14/16] fanotify: report parent fid + name with FAN_REPORT_NAME Amir Goldstein
2020-02-17 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 15/16] fanotify: refine rules for when name is reported Amir Goldstein
2020-02-17 13:14 ` [BONUS][PATCH v2 16/16] fanotify: support limited functionality for unprivileged users Amir Goldstein
2020-02-20 22:10 ` [PATCH v2 00/16] Fanotify event with name info Matthew Bobrowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAOQ4uxiXbGF+RRUmnP4Sbub+3TxEavmCvi0AYpwHuLepqexdCA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).