From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
To: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.de>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
Steve French <sfrench@samba.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>,
Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@netapp.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>,
Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>,
Luis Lozano <llozano@chromium.org>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>,
Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@umich.edu>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
ceph-devel <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
CIFS <linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org>,
samba-technical <samba-technical@lists.samba.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] vfs: fix copy_file_range regression in cross-fs copies
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 16:58:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOQ4uxj=ZeJ0HYtivP=pg5mSDaiQGU8Fz8qw0Egfa2Ert5Ra7A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210218143635.24916-1-lhenriques@suse.de>
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 4:35 PM Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.de> wrote:
>
> A regression has been reported by Nicolas Boichat, found while using the
> copy_file_range syscall to copy a tracefs file. Before commit
> 5dae222a5ff0 ("vfs: allow copy_file_range to copy across devices") the
> kernel would return -EXDEV to userspace when trying to copy a file across
> different filesystems. After this commit, the syscall doesn't fail anymore
> and instead returns zero (zero bytes copied), as this file's content is
> generated on-the-fly and thus reports a size of zero.
>
> This patch restores some cross-filesystem copy restrictions that existed
> prior to commit 5dae222a5ff0 ("vfs: allow copy_file_range to copy across
> devices"). Filesystems are still allowed to fall-back to the VFS
> generic_copy_file_range() implementation, but that has now to be done
> explicitly.
>
> nfsd is also modified to use generic_copy_file_range() instead of
> vfs_copy_file_range() so that it can still fall-back to splice without going
> through all the checks.
>
> Fixes: 5dae222a5ff0 ("vfs: allow copy_file_range to copy across devices")
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20210212044405.4120619-1-drinkcat@chromium.org/
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/CANMq1KDZuxir2LM5jOTm0xx+BnvW=ZmpsG47CyHFJwnw7zSX6Q@mail.gmail.com/
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20210126135012.1.If45b7cdc3ff707bc1efa17f5366057d60603c45f@changeid/
> Reported-by: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.de>
> ---
> And here's v4. I'd like to request help for testing. I know Nicolas is
> doing that (thanks! and thanks for the reviews). But it would be great to
> get at least the nfs code tested. Olga, can you help here?
>
> Changes since v3
> - dropped the COPY_FILE_SPLICE flag
> - kept the f_op's checks early in generic_copy_file_checks, implementing
> Amir's suggestions
> - modified nfsd to use generic_copy_file_range()
> Changes since v2
> - do all the required checks earlier, in generic_copy_file_checks(),
> adding new checks for ->remap_file_range
> - new COPY_FILE_SPLICE flag
> - don't remove filesystem's fallback to generic_copy_file_range()
> - updated commit changelog (and subject)
> Changes since v1 (after Amir review)
> - restored do_copy_file_range() helper
> - return -EOPNOTSUPP if fs doesn't implement CFR
> - updated commit description
>
> fs/nfsd/vfs.c | 2 +-
> fs/read_write.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> index 04937e51de56..49dd28ee2602 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> @@ -578,7 +578,7 @@ ssize_t nfsd_copy_file_range(struct file *src, u64 src_pos, struct file *dst,
> * limit like this and pipeline multiple COPY requests.
> */
> count = min_t(u64, count, 1 << 22);
> - return vfs_copy_file_range(src, src_pos, dst, dst_pos, count, 0);
> + return generic_copy_file_range(src, src_pos, dst, dst_pos, count, 0);
That is not the desired change.
It should try vfs_copy_file_range() and fallback to generic_copy_file_range()
for EXDEV and EOPNOTSUPP.
I will explain why.
This code runs on nfs server.
The nfs client requested remote server side copy offload using
nfs4_copy_file_range() and remote request is handled here.
It is not enough to generic_copy_file_range() on the server because
the source and destination themselves can be on yet another remote
location (cifs/ceph/nfs), so this is why calling vfs_copy_file_range()
here is important.
At least that is my understanding.
Unlike userspace copy fallback, if the server returns -EXDEV the client
will need to transfer the data over the network.
That is why the generic_copy_file_range() fallback is important.
> }
>
> __be32 nfsd4_vfs_fallocate(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp,
> diff --git a/fs/read_write.c b/fs/read_write.c
> index 75f764b43418..214d44f7cbfa 100644
> --- a/fs/read_write.c
> +++ b/fs/read_write.c
> @@ -1388,28 +1388,6 @@ ssize_t generic_copy_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(generic_copy_file_range);
>
> -static ssize_t do_copy_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
> - struct file *file_out, loff_t pos_out,
> - size_t len, unsigned int flags)
> -{
> - /*
> - * Although we now allow filesystems to handle cross sb copy, passing
> - * a file of the wrong filesystem type to filesystem driver can result
> - * in an attempt to dereference the wrong type of ->private_data, so
> - * avoid doing that until we really have a good reason. NFS defines
> - * several different file_system_type structures, but they all end up
> - * using the same ->copy_file_range() function pointer.
> - */
> - if (file_out->f_op->copy_file_range &&
> - file_out->f_op->copy_file_range == file_in->f_op->copy_file_range)
> - return file_out->f_op->copy_file_range(file_in, pos_in,
> - file_out, pos_out,
> - len, flags);
> -
> - return generic_copy_file_range(file_in, pos_in, file_out, pos_out, len,
> - flags);
> -}
> -
> /*
> * Performs necessary checks before doing a file copy
> *
> @@ -1427,6 +1405,25 @@ static int generic_copy_file_checks(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
> loff_t size_in;
> int ret;
>
> + /*
> + * Although we now allow filesystems to handle cross sb copy, passing
> + * a file of the wrong filesystem type to filesystem driver can result
> + * in an attempt to dereference the wrong type of ->private_data, so
> + * avoid doing that until we really have a good reason. NFS defines
> + * several different file_system_type structures, but they all end up
> + * using the same ->copy_file_range() function pointer.
> + */
> + if (file_out->f_op->copy_file_range) {
> + if (file_in->f_op->copy_file_range !=
> + file_out->f_op->copy_file_range)
> + return -EXDEV;
> + } else if (file_in->f_op->remap_file_range) {
> + if (file_inode(file_in)->i_sb != file_inode(file_out)->i_sb)
> + return -EXDEV;
> + } else {
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
> +
> ret = generic_file_rw_checks(file_in, file_out);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> @@ -1499,8 +1496,7 @@ ssize_t vfs_copy_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
> * Try cloning first, this is supported by more file systems, and
> * more efficient if both clone and copy are supported (e.g. NFS).
> */
> - if (file_in->f_op->remap_file_range &&
> - file_inode(file_in)->i_sb == file_inode(file_out)->i_sb) {
> + if (file_in->f_op->remap_file_range) {
> loff_t cloned;
>
> cloned = file_in->f_op->remap_file_range(file_in, pos_in,
> @@ -1513,9 +1509,9 @@ ssize_t vfs_copy_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
> }
> }
>
> - ret = do_copy_file_range(file_in, pos_in, file_out, pos_out, len,
> - flags);
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(ret == -EOPNOTSUPP);
> + ret = file_out->f_op->copy_file_range(file_in, pos_in,
> + file_out, pos_out,
> + len, flags);
I see you have made an assumption here that if we did not clone then
file_out->f_op->copy_file_range must be valid.
It is not true.
file_out->f_op->copy_file_range could be NULL and we got here becauses
remap_file_range was attempted and failed.
So you still need to check for non-NULL file_out->f_op->copy_file_range
here just like it was before the regressing commit.
Otherwise, looks ok to me, but without NFS testing we won't know for sure
It's a tricky one...
Thanks,
Amir.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-18 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 136+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-12 4:43 [PATCH 0/6] Add generated flag to filesystem struct to block copy_file_range Nicolas Boichat
2021-02-12 4:44 ` [PATCH 1/6] fs: Add flag to file_system_type to indicate content is generated Nicolas Boichat
2021-02-12 7:46 ` Greg KH
2021-02-12 8:20 ` Nicolas Boichat
2021-02-12 8:37 ` Greg KH
2021-02-12 15:33 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2021-02-12 15:45 ` Greg KH
2021-02-12 15:59 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2021-02-12 16:28 ` Greg KH
2021-02-12 20:22 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2021-02-12 23:03 ` Dave Chinner
2021-02-12 23:07 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2021-02-12 23:27 ` Dave Chinner
2021-02-12 23:54 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-02-15 0:38 ` Dave Chinner
2021-02-15 1:12 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2021-02-15 1:25 ` Nicolas Boichat
2021-02-15 5:56 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-15 8:30 ` Greg KH
2021-02-12 8:22 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-12 8:39 ` Greg KH
2021-02-12 12:05 ` Luis Henriques
2021-02-12 12:18 ` Greg KH
2021-02-12 12:41 ` Luis Henriques
2021-02-12 14:11 ` Greg KH
2021-02-12 15:01 ` Luis Henriques
2021-02-15 6:12 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-15 10:39 ` Luis Henriques
2021-02-15 12:22 ` Luis Henriques
2021-02-15 14:23 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-15 14:51 ` Luis Henriques
2021-02-15 15:43 ` [PATCH v2] vfs: prevent copy_file_range to copy across devices Luis Henriques
2021-02-15 16:02 ` Trond Myklebust
2021-02-16 0:25 ` Steve French
2021-02-15 16:34 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-15 16:53 ` Trond Myklebust
2021-02-15 17:24 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-15 18:57 ` Trond Myklebust
2021-02-15 19:43 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-16 11:17 ` Luis Henriques
2021-02-16 11:28 ` gregkh
2021-02-16 12:01 ` Luis Henriques
2021-02-16 12:08 ` Greg KH
2021-02-16 13:51 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-16 16:42 ` Luis Henriques
2021-02-16 17:44 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-16 18:55 ` Luis Henriques
2021-02-16 19:20 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-16 19:27 ` Anna Schumaker
2021-02-16 19:31 ` Steve French
2021-02-16 19:40 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-16 21:15 ` Steve French
2021-02-17 8:08 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-17 17:26 ` [PATCH v3] vfs: fix copy_file_range regression in cross-fs copies Luis Henriques
2021-02-17 20:47 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-18 0:56 ` Nicolas Boichat
2021-02-18 5:32 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2021-02-18 6:47 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-18 16:28 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2021-02-18 7:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-02-18 0:50 ` [PATCH v2] vfs: prevent copy_file_range to copy across devices Andreas Dilger
2021-02-18 7:34 ` gregkh
2021-02-16 18:54 ` Andreas Dilger
2021-02-17 4:45 ` Nicolas Boichat
2021-02-18 7:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-02-18 9:10 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-18 10:29 ` Luis Henriques
2021-02-18 12:15 ` Luis Henriques
2021-02-18 12:49 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-18 14:36 ` [PATCH v4] vfs: fix copy_file_range regression in cross-fs copies Luis Henriques
2021-02-18 14:58 ` Amir Goldstein [this message]
2021-02-18 15:17 ` [PATCH v5] " Luis Henriques
2021-02-18 15:53 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-18 16:35 ` Luis Henriques
2021-02-18 17:18 ` [PATCH v6] " Luis Henriques
2021-02-19 21:18 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2021-02-19 21:52 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-21 19:58 ` [PATCH v7] " Luis Henriques
2021-02-22 3:00 ` Nicolas Boichat
2021-02-22 10:24 ` [PATCH v8] " Luis Henriques
2021-02-22 10:46 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-22 16:25 ` dai.ngo
2021-02-23 10:32 ` Luis Henriques
2021-02-23 15:28 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-23 15:29 ` dai.ngo
2021-02-23 16:02 ` dai.ngo
2021-02-23 16:47 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-23 16:57 ` dai.ngo
[not found] ` <e3eed18b-fc7e-e687-608b-7f662017329c@oracle.com>
2021-02-23 17:33 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-24 0:13 ` dai.ngo
2021-02-23 17:56 ` Luis Henriques
2021-02-23 17:13 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2021-02-24 1:00 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2021-02-24 10:23 ` Luis Henriques
2021-02-24 10:44 ` Nicolas Boichat
2021-04-09 5:23 ` Nicolas Boichat
2021-04-09 13:39 ` Luis Henriques
2021-04-09 13:50 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-04-23 4:40 ` Nicolas Boichat
2021-05-03 8:54 ` Luis Henriques
2021-05-10 4:59 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-05-10 9:10 ` Luis Henriques
2021-02-24 14:23 ` [PATCH] copy_file_range.2: Kernel v5.12 updates Luis Henriques
2021-02-24 16:10 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-25 10:21 ` Luis Henriques
2021-02-26 10:13 ` Alejandro Colomar (man-pages)
2021-02-26 10:34 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-26 11:15 ` Alejandro Colomar (man-pages)
2021-02-26 13:59 ` Jeff Layton
2021-02-26 21:26 ` Alejandro Colomar (man-pages)
2021-02-26 22:18 ` Alejandro Colomar (man-pages)
2021-02-27 5:41 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-27 12:20 ` Alejandro Colomar (man-pages)
2021-02-27 13:49 ` [RFC v2] copy_file_range.2: Update cross-filesystem support for 5.12 Alejandro Colomar
2021-02-27 16:00 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-27 23:08 ` [PATCH] copy_file_range.2: Kernel v5.12 updates Steve French
2021-02-28 7:35 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-28 22:25 ` Steve French
2021-03-01 6:18 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-03-01 14:41 ` [RFC v3] copy_file_range.2: Update cross-filesystem support for 5.12 Alejandro Colomar
2021-03-01 14:58 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-03-04 9:38 ` [RFC v4] " Alejandro Colomar
2021-03-04 17:13 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-03-04 18:24 ` Alejandro Colomar (man-pages)
2021-03-04 23:50 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-02-24 7:15 ` [PATCH v4] vfs: fix copy_file_range regression in cross-fs copies Amir Goldstein
2021-02-24 8:30 ` Petr Vorel
2021-02-18 20:41 ` [PATCH v2] vfs: prevent copy_file_range to copy across devices Steve French
2021-02-12 23:15 ` [PATCH 1/6] fs: Add flag to file_system_type to indicate content is generated Dave Chinner
2021-02-12 7:54 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-02-12 4:44 ` [PATCH 2/6] proc: Add FS_GENERATED_CONTENT to filesystem flags Nicolas Boichat
2021-02-12 4:44 ` [PATCH 6/6] vfs: Disallow copy_file_range on generated file systems Nicolas Boichat
2021-02-12 4:53 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-02-12 4:59 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-02-12 5:24 ` Nicolas Boichat
2021-02-14 23:09 ` [PATCH 0/6] Add generated flag to filesystem struct to block copy_file_range Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAOQ4uxj=ZeJ0HYtivP=pg5mSDaiQGU8Fz8qw0Egfa2Ert5Ra7A@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=adilger@dilger.ca \
--cc=aglo@umich.edu \
--cc=anna.schumaker@netapp.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=drinkcat@chromium.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=iant@google.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=lhenriques@suse.de \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llozano@chromium.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=samba-technical@lists.samba.org \
--cc=sfrench@samba.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).