From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Matthew Bobrowski <mbobrowski@mbobrowski.org>,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/4] fanotify: introduce new event mask FAN_OPEN_EXEC and FAN_OPEN_EXEC_PERM
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 05:43:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOQ4uxjgToX6RZ+oGZgx_sfRL1ET1gvUWwDntGvN4h5-B6On9w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOQ4uxiSN7wGBejSGAYyqQTbe64SbWirWAwFq+FV8TsVOD16sA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 8:01 PM Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > LTP tests for this feature are on my 'fanotify-exec' branch here:
> > > https://github.com/matthewbobrowski/ltp/commits/fanotify_exec. The files
> > > that contains the test cases are provided below:
> > >
> > > syscalls/fanotify03: test cases have been updated to cover
> > > FAN_OPEN_EXEC_PERM events
> > > syscalls/fanotify12: newly introduced LTP test file to cover
> > > FAN_OPEN_EXEC events
> >
> > I have been wondering for a while why the testcases passed when ignore mask
> > hasn't been properly treated in fanotify_group_event_mask() but then I
> > realized that the generic code will not even call to fanotify if ignore
> > masks result in clearing the event.
>
> So does that means we have missing test coverage?
>
This is covered by test case #3 of Matthew's proposed LTP test.
https://github.com/matthewbobrowski/ltp/commit/9e350fe15a5423d896ed0e8e147edc15bee13b42#diff-2bb8ddff24b3a031be0f64354262e587R76
> I think the idea of this patch was that
> FAN_MARK_INODE, FAN_OPEN | FAN_OPEN_EXEC
> +
> FAN_MARK_MOUNT, FAN_MARK_IGNORED_MASK | FAN_OPEN_EXEC
>
Not even mount mark. ignore mask on the same inode mark as well.
Thanks,
Amir.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-14 13:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-08 3:04 [PATCH v7 0/4] fanotify: introduce new event mask FAN_OPEN_EXEC and FAN_OPEN_EXEC_PERM Matthew Bobrowski
2018-11-08 3:05 ` [PATCH v7 1/4] fanotify: return only user requested event types in event mask Matthew Bobrowski
2018-11-13 17:38 ` Jan Kara
2018-11-13 17:53 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-11-13 23:54 ` Matthew Bobrowski
2018-11-14 12:04 ` Jan Kara
2018-11-08 3:07 ` [PATCH v7 2/4] fanotify: introduce new event mask FAN_OPEN_EXEC Matthew Bobrowski
2018-11-08 18:22 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-09 5:41 ` Matthew Bobrowski
2018-11-09 6:04 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-09 7:27 ` Matthew Bobrowski
2018-11-12 16:14 ` Jan Kara
2018-11-12 16:37 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-13 11:45 ` Matthew Bobrowski
2018-11-13 17:35 ` Jan Kara
2018-11-13 23:26 ` Matthew Bobrowski
2018-11-08 3:10 ` [PATCH v7 3/4] fsnotify: refactor fsnotify_parent()/fsnotify() paired calls when event is on path Matthew Bobrowski
2018-11-08 3:12 ` [PATCH v7 4/4] fanotify: introduce new event mask FAN_OPEN_EXEC_PERM Matthew Bobrowski
2018-11-13 17:53 ` [PATCH v7 0/4] fanotify: introduce new event mask FAN_OPEN_EXEC and FAN_OPEN_EXEC_PERM Jan Kara
2018-11-13 18:01 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-11-14 3:43 ` Amir Goldstein [this message]
2018-11-14 12:02 ` Jan Kara
2018-11-14 15:54 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-11-19 10:27 ` Matthew Bobrowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAOQ4uxjgToX6RZ+oGZgx_sfRL1ET1gvUWwDntGvN4h5-B6On9w@mail.gmail.com \
--to=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbobrowski@mbobrowski.org \
--cc=sgrubb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).