From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
brho@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dax: Fix deadlock in dax_lock_mapping_entry()
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 11:22:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4hut3P5fiNHgjpf4Qg_nBo9JKkovCdrUnzXyji=ey8zJw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180927134129.GB8800@quack2.suse.cz>
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 6:41 AM Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
>
> On Thu 27-09-18 06:28:43, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 01:23:32PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > When dax_lock_mapping_entry() has to sleep to obtain entry lock, it will
> > > fail to unlock mapping->i_pages spinlock and thus immediately deadlock
> > > against itself when retrying to grab the entry lock again. Fix the
> > > problem by unlocking mapping->i_pages before retrying.
> >
> > It seems weird that xfstests doesn't provoke this ...
>
> The function currently gets called only from mm/memory-failure.c. And yes,
> we are lacking DAX hwpoison error tests in fstests...
I have an item on my backlog to port the ndctl unit test that does
memory_failure() injection vs ext4 over to fstests. That said I've
been investigating a deadlock on ext4 caused by this test. When I saw
this patch I hoped it was root cause, but the test is still failing
for me. Vishal is able to pass the test on his system, so the failure
mode is timing dependent. I'm running this patch on top of -rc5 and
still seeing the following deadlock.
EXT4-fs (pmem0): DAX enabled. Warning: EXPERIMENTAL, use at your own risk
EXT4-fs (pmem0): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: dax
Injecting memory failure for pfn 0x208900 at process virtual
address 0x7f5872900000
Memory failure: 0x208900: Killing dax-pmd:7095 due to hardware
memory corruption
Memory failure: 0x208900: recovery action for dax page: Recovered
watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#35 stuck for 22s! [dax-pmd:7095]
[..]
irq event stamp: 121911146
hardirqs last enabled at (121911145): [<ffffffff81aa1bd9>]
_raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x29/0x40 hardirqs last disabled at
(121911146): [<ffffffff810037a3>] trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x1a/0x1c
softirqs last enabled at (78238674): [<ffffffff81e0032e>]
__do_softirq+0x32e/0x428
softirqs last disabled at (78238627): [<ffffffff810bc6f6>]
irq_exit+0xf6/0x100
CPU: 35 PID: 7095 Comm: dax-pmd Tainted: G OE
4.19.0-rc5+ #2394
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS
rel-1.11.1-0-g0551a4be2c-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:lock_release+0x134/0x2a0
[..]
Call Trace:
find_get_entries+0x299/0x3c0
pagevec_lookup_entries+0x1a/0x30
dax_layout_busy_page+0x9c/0x280
? __lock_acquire+0x12fa/0x1310
ext4_break_layouts+0x48/0x100
? ext4_punch_hole+0x108/0x5a0
ext4_punch_hole+0x110/0x5a0
ext4_fallocate+0x189/0xa40
? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x6b/0x80
? rcu_sync_lockdep_assert+0x2e/0x60
vfs_fallocate+0x13f/0x270
The same test against xfs is not failing for me. I have been seeking
some focus time to dig in on this.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-28 0:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-27 11:23 [PATCH] dax: Fix deadlock in dax_lock_mapping_entry() Jan Kara
2018-09-27 13:28 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-09-27 13:41 ` Jan Kara
2018-09-27 18:22 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2018-10-04 16:27 ` Jan Kara
2018-10-05 1:57 ` Dan Williams
2018-10-05 2:52 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-10-05 4:01 ` Dan Williams
2018-10-05 4:28 ` Dan Williams
2018-10-05 9:54 ` Jan Kara
2018-10-06 18:04 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAPcyv4hut3P5fiNHgjpf4Qg_nBo9JKkovCdrUnzXyji=ey8zJw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=brho@google.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).