From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A7F1C433F5 for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 10:51:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229566AbiJDKv0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Oct 2022 06:51:26 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58340 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229728AbiJDKvF (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Oct 2022 06:51:05 -0400 Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [IPv6:2001:67c:2178:6::1d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B50F54C9C; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 03:50:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C77911F7AB; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 10:50:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1664880644; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=6CpXpnANGiqLNW8AuN+v74uE4I08ZrzS2Sw8W1oqoA0=; b=nXaMHs+rJdgfxOkTQMYu8FTsMGigk8dgQDExbBPXMq8fktJWi9D0gJqNbnt32z+2ijJwDt gF7SdVjozEjOX8MpT7m0s8loRBO5HvEzp3add/DtUnp2/2rHA4wdUCvDP2c6O4N5ZeMLUo z+yGuregFhpfW3BWiiTXBtzF301Rxpc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1664880644; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=6CpXpnANGiqLNW8AuN+v74uE4I08ZrzS2Sw8W1oqoA0=; b=5uN0MVcpQ8avYsJ2q9dJ+cqHNEy21T/qOglGLbJVJbTqQDvjb8/cvXbOd6sE/0eiiuWVYq pCTRUuS62rhuF5Cg== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FA28139D2; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 10:50:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id ouWvGAQQPGPMEQAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Tue, 04 Oct 2022 10:50:44 +0000 Received: from localhost (brahms.olymp [local]) by brahms.olymp (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id a481215e; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 10:51:39 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2022 11:51:39 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Lu=EDs?= Henriques To: Jeff Layton Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, David Howells Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/23] ceph: Convert ceph_writepages_start() to use filemap_get_folios_tag() Message-ID: References: <20220912182224.514561-1-vishal.moola@gmail.com> <20220912182224.514561-9-vishal.moola@gmail.com> <35d965bbc3d27e43d6743fc3a5cb042503a1b7bf.camel@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 05:49:28AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > On Tue, 2022-10-04 at 10:07 +0100, Luís Henriques wrote: > > Hi Jeff, > > > > (Trimming down the CC list) > > > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 12:25:15PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > > > > > > We have some work in progress to add write helpers to netfslib. Once we > > > get those in place, we plan to convert ceph to use them. At that point > > > ceph_writepages just goes away. > > > > Sorry for hijacking this thread, but I was wondering if there was > > something I could help here. I haven't seen any netfs patches for this > > lately, but I may have been looking at the wrong places. I guess these > > are still the bits that are holding the ceph fscrypt from progressing, so, > > again, I'd be happy to at least help with the testing. > > > > Work is somewhat stalled at the moment. David was on holiday for a while > and I've had other priorities. I would like to see this wrapped up soon > too however. OK, awesome. I just took this chance to make sure I didn't miss any netfs update while I was also on vacations. I'll keep watching, thanks a lot for the update, Jeff! Cheers, -- Luís