linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Frank Sorenson <frank@tuxrocks.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: use iomap_valid method to detect stale cached iomaps
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2022 18:34:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YzzfF/o695eRpOhY@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d00aff43-2bdc-0724-1996-4e58e061ecfd@redhat.com>

On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 06:34:03PM -0500, Frank Sorenson wrote:
> 
> 
> On 9/28/22 20:45, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 09:54:27PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> 
> > > Btw, can you share the reproducer?
> 
> > Not sure. The current reproducer I have is 2500 lines of complex C
> > code that was originally based on a reproducer the original reporter
> > provided. It does lots of stuff that isn't directly related to
> > reproducing the issue, and will be impossible to review and maintain
> > as it stands in fstests.
> 
> Too true.  Fortunately, now that I understand the necessary conditions
> and IO patterns, I managed to prune it all down to ~75 lines of bash
> calling xfs_io.  See below.
> 
> Frank
> --
> Frank Sorenson
> sorenson@redhat.com
> Principal Software Maintenance Engineer
> Global Support Services - filesystems
> Red Hat
> 
> ###########################################
> #!/bin/bash
> #	Frank Sorenson <sorenson@redhat.com>, 2022
> 
> num_files=8
> num_writers=3
> 
> KiB=1024
> MiB=$(( $KiB * $KiB ))
> GiB=$(( $KiB * $KiB * $KiB ))
> 
> file_size=$(( 500 * $MiB ))
> #file_size=$(( 1 * $GiB ))
> write_size=$(( 1 * $MiB ))
> start_offset=512
> 
> num_loops=$(( ($file_size - $start_offset + (($num_writers * $write_size) - 1)) / ($num_writers * $write_size) ))
> total_size=$(( ($num_loops * $num_writers * $write_size) + $start_offset ))
> 
> cgroup_path=/sys/fs/cgroup/test_write_bug
> mkdir -p $cgroup_path || { echo "unable to create cgroup" ; exit ; }
> 
> max_mem=$(( 40 * $MiB ))
> high_mem=$(( ($max_mem * 9) / 10 ))
> echo $high_mem >$cgroup_path/memory.high
> echo $max_mem >$cgroup_path/memory.max

Hmm, so we setup a cgroup a very low memory limit, and then kick off a
lot of threads doing IO... which I guess is how you ended up with a long
write to an unwritten extent that races with memory reclaim targetting a
dirty page at the end of that unwritten extent for writeback and
eviction.

I wonder, if we had a way to slow down iomap_write_iter, could we
simulate the writeback and eviction with sync_file_range and
madvise(MADV_FREE)?

(I've been playing with a debug knob to slow down writeback for a
different corruption problem I've been working on, and it's taken the
repro time down from days to a 5 second fstest.)

Anyhow, thanks for the simplified repo, I'll keep thinking about this. :)

--D

> mkdir -p testfiles
> rm -f testfiles/expected
> xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -b $((1 * $MiB)) -S 0x40 0 $total_size" testfiles/expected >/dev/null 2>&1
> expected_sum=$(md5sum testfiles/expected | awk '{print $1}')
> 
> echo $$ > $cgroup_path/cgroup.procs || exit # put ourselves in the cgroup
> 
> do_one_testfile() {
> 	filenum=$1
> 	cpids=""
> 	offset=$start_offset
> 
> 	rm -f testfiles/test$filenum
> 	xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -b $start_offset -S 0x40 0 $start_offset" testfiles/test$filenum >/dev/null 2>&1
> 
> 	while [[ $offset -lt $file_size ]] ; do
> 		cpids=""
> 		for i in $(seq 1 $num_writers) ; do
> 			xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -b $write_size -S 0x40 $(( ($offset + (($num_writers - $i) * $write_size)  ) )) $write_size" testfiles/test$filenum >/dev/null 2>&1 &
> 			cpids="$cpids $!"
> 		done
> 		wait $cpids
> 		offset=$(( $offset + ($num_writers * $write_size) ))
> 	done
> }
> 
> round=1
> while [[ 42 ]] ; do
> 	echo "test round: $round"
> 	cpids=""
> 	for i in $(seq 1 $num_files) ; do
> 		do_one_testfile $i &
> 		cpids="$cpids $!"
> 	done
> 	wait $cpids
> 
> 	replicated="" # now check the files
> 	for i in $(seq 1 $num_files) ; do
> 		sum=$(md5sum testfiles/test$i | awk '{print $1}')
> 		[[ $sum == $expected_sum ]] || replicated="$replicated testfiles/test$i"
> 	done
> 
> 	[[ -n $replicated ]] && break
> 	round=$(($round + 1))
> done
> echo "replicated bug with: $replicated"
> echo $$ > /sys/fs/cgroup/cgroup.procs
> rmdir $cgroup_path

  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-05  1:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-21  8:29 [RFC PATCH 0/2] iomap/xfs: fix data corruption due to stale cached iomaps Dave Chinner
2022-09-21  8:29 ` [PATCH 1/2] iomap: write iomap validity checks Dave Chinner
2022-09-22  3:40   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-09-22 23:16     ` Dave Chinner
2022-09-28  4:48       ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-09-21  8:29 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs: use iomap_valid method to detect stale cached iomaps Dave Chinner
2022-09-22  3:44   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-09-23  0:04     ` Dave Chinner
2022-09-28  4:54       ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-09-29  1:45         ` Dave Chinner
2022-10-04 23:34           ` Frank Sorenson
2022-10-05  1:34             ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2022-09-22  4:25 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] iomap/xfs: fix data corruption due to " Darrick J. Wong
2022-09-22 22:59   ` Dave Chinner
2022-09-28  5:16     ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-09-29  2:11       ` Dave Chinner
2022-09-29  2:15         ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YzzfF/o695eRpOhY@magnolia \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=frank@tuxrocks.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).