From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from www262.sakura.ne.jp ([202.181.97.72]:39048 "EHLO www262.sakura.ne.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S937592AbeFSLpJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jun 2018 07:45:09 -0400 Subject: Re: INFO: task hung in __get_super To: syzbot , syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com References: <001a113ed5540f411c0568cc8418@google.com> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk From: Tetsuo Handa Message-ID: Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 20:44:57 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <001a113ed5540f411c0568cc8418@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: This bug report is getting no feedback, but I guess that this bug is in block or mm or locking layer rather than fs layer. NMI backtrace for this bug tends to report that sb_bread() from fill_super() from mount_bdev() is stalling is the cause of keep holding s_umount_key for more than 120 seconds. What is strange is that NMI backtrace for this bug tends to point at rcu_read_lock()/pagecache_get_page()/radix_tree_deref_slot()/ rcu_read_unlock() which is expected not to stall. Since CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_TIMEOUT is set to 120 (and actually +5 due to CONFIG_PROVE_RCU=y) which is longer than CONFIG_DEFAULT_HUNG_TASK_TIMEOUT, maybe setting CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_TIMEOUT to smaller values (e.g. 25) can give us some hints...