linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: cl@linux.com
To: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	"Darrick J . Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm, sl[aou]b: guarantee natural alignment for kmalloc(power-of-two)
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 20:52:52 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1909242048020.17661@www.lameter.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190923171710.GN2751@twin.jikos.cz>

On Mon, 23 Sep 2019, David Sterba wrote:

> As a user of the allocator interface in filesystem, I'd like to see a
> more generic way to address the alignment guarantees so we don't have to
> apply workarounds like 3acd48507dc43eeeb each time we find that we
> missed something. (Where 'missed' might be another sort of weird memory
> corruption hard to trigger.)

The alignment guarantees are clearly documented and objects are misaligned
in debugging kernels.

Looking at 3acd48507dc43eeeb:Looks like no one tested that patch with a
debug kernel or full debugging on until it hit mainline. Not good.

The consequence for the lack of proper testing is to make the production
kernel contain the debug measures?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-09-24 21:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-26 11:16 [PATCH v2 0/2] guarantee natural alignment for kmalloc() Vlastimil Babka
2019-08-26 11:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mm, sl[ou]b: improve memory accounting Vlastimil Babka
2019-08-26 11:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mm, sl[aou]b: guarantee natural alignment for kmalloc(power-of-two) Vlastimil Babka
2019-08-28 18:45   ` Christopher Lameter
2019-08-28 19:46     ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-08-28 22:24       ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-29  7:56         ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-08-30  0:29           ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-29  7:39       ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-30 17:41         ` Christopher Lameter
2019-09-01  0:52           ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-09-03 20:13             ` Christopher Lameter
2019-09-03 20:53               ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-09-04  5:19                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-09-04  6:40                   ` Ming Lei
2019-09-04  7:20                     ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-09-04 19:31                 ` Christopher Lameter
2019-09-23 16:36   ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-09-23 17:17     ` David Sterba
2019-09-23 17:51       ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-09-24 20:47         ` cl
2019-09-24 20:51           ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-09-24 20:55             ` cl
2019-09-26 13:02               ` David Sterba
2019-09-24 21:19         ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-09-24 21:53           ` Dave Chinner
2019-09-24 22:21             ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-09-24 20:52       ` cl [this message]
2019-09-24 23:54         ` Andrew Morton
2019-09-25  7:17           ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-09-26  0:16             ` Christopher Lameter
2019-09-26  0:14           ` Christopher Lameter
2019-09-26  7:41             ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-09-28  1:12               ` Christopher Lameter
2019-09-30 13:32                 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-09-23 17:54     ` Roman Gushchin
2019-09-30  8:06     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-09-30  9:23     ` Michal Hocko
2019-09-30  9:32       ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-09-23 18:57   ` Matthew Wilcox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.21.1909242048020.17661@www.lameter.com \
    --to=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).