From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/23] File descriptor hot-unplug support v2 Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 11:01:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <20090606080334.GA15204@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20090608162913.GL8633@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20090608175018.GM8633@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Miklos Szeredi , ebiederm@xmission.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, hugh@veritas.com, tj@kernel.org, adobriyan@gmail.com, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, gregkh@suse.de, npiggin@suse.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, hch@infradead.org To: Al Viro Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090608175018.GM8633@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 8 Jun 2009, Al Viro wrote: > > Welcome to reality... > > * bread() is non-interruptible > * so's copy_from_user()/copy_to_user() > * IO we are stuck upon _might_ be interruptible, but by sending a signal > to some other process We can probably improve on these, though. Like the copy_to/from_user thing. We might well be able to do that whole "if it's a fatal signal, return early" thing. So in the _general_ case - no, we probably can't fix things. But we could likely at least improve in some common cases if we cared. Linus -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org