From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
<jack@suse.cz>
Cc: <tytso@mit.edu>, <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, <hch@infradead.org>,
<mcgrof@kernel.org>, <keescook@chromium.org>,
<yzaikin@google.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] block_dump: remove block dump
Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 09:29:08 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c432c9b0-cef1-123e-1fcd-0549b24e381e@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15f9c6ce-f22a-59cd-8ce7-eb908f663826@kernel.dk>
On 2021/3/13 11:37, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 3/12/21 8:01 PM, zhangyi (F) wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> block_dump is an old debugging interface and can be replaced by
>> tracepoints, and we also found a deadlock issue relate to it[1]. As Jan
>> suggested, this patch set delete the whole block_dump feature, we can
>> use tracepoints to get the similar information. If someone still using
>> this feature cannot switch to use tracepoints or any other suggestions,
>> please let us know.
>
> Totally agree, that's long overdue. The feature is no longer useful
> and has been deprecated by much better methods. Unless anyone objects,
> I'll queue this up for 5.13.
>
Hi, Jens. Could you please send these patches upstream ?
Thanks,
Yi.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-10 1:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-13 3:01 [RFC PATCH 0/3] block_dump: remove block dump zhangyi (F)
2021-03-13 3:01 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] block_dump: remove block_dump feature in mark_inode_dirty() zhangyi (F)
2021-03-15 9:47 ` Jan Kara
2021-03-13 3:01 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] block_dump: remove block_dump feature zhangyi (F)
2021-03-15 9:48 ` Jan Kara
2021-03-13 3:01 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] block_dump: remove comments in docs zhangyi (F)
2021-03-15 9:48 ` Jan Kara
2021-03-13 3:37 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] block_dump: remove block dump Jens Axboe
2021-05-10 1:29 ` Zhang Yi [this message]
2021-03-15 9:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-10 15:21 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c432c9b0-cef1-123e-1fcd-0549b24e381e@huawei.com \
--to=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=yzaikin@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).