From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90074C35247 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 02:31:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71A2921D7D for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 02:31:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727379AbgBGCbU (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Feb 2020 21:31:20 -0500 Received: from out30-57.freemail.mail.aliyun.com ([115.124.30.57]:55564 "EHLO out30-57.freemail.mail.aliyun.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726597AbgBGCbU (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Feb 2020 21:31:20 -0500 X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R141e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=e01e07488;MF=yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=18;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0TpJAGI8_1581042674; Received: from testdeMacBook-Pro.local(mailfrom:yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0TpJAGI8_1581042674) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Fri, 07 Feb 2020 10:31:15 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/2] sched/numa: introduce numa locality To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , Dietmar Eggemann , Ben Segall , Mel Gorman , Luis Chamberlain , Kees Cook , Iurii Zaikin , =?UTF-8?Q?Michal_Koutn=c3=bd?= , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, "Paul E. McKenney" , Randy Dunlap , Jonathan Corbet References: <743eecad-9556-a241-546b-c8a66339840e@linux.alibaba.com> <207ef46c-672c-27c8-2012-735bd692a6de@linux.alibaba.com> <040def80-9c38-4bcc-e4a8-8a0d10f131ed@linux.alibaba.com> <25cf7ef5-e37e-7578-eea7-29ad0b76c4ea@linux.alibaba.com> <443641e7-f968-0954-5ff6-3b7e7fed0e83@linux.alibaba.com> <3b2c5a07-4bc0-1feb-2daf-260e4d58c7b6@linux.alibaba.com> <20200206202504.7175c4a8@oasis.local.home> From: =?UTF-8?B?546L6LSH?= Message-ID: Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 10:31:14 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200206202504.7175c4a8@oasis.local.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On 2020/2/7 上午9:25, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 09:10:33 +0800 > ηŽ‹θ΄‡ wrote: > >> Hi, Peter, Ingo >> >> Could you give some comments please? > > A little word of advice. When sending new versions of a patch. Don't > send them as a reply to the previous version. Some developers (and I > believe Peter is one of them), wont look for new patches in threads, > and this may never be seen by him. > > New versions of patches (v8 in this case) need to start a new thread > and be at the top level. It's hard to manage patches when a thread > series in embedded in another thread series. Aha, I do believe that's the situation... I'll resend the v8 with the Ack from Randy, thanks for the advice :-) Regards, Michael Wang > > -- Steve >