From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEFA3C31E5B for ; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 01:47:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C331220657 for ; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 01:47:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726095AbfFRBrY (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jun 2019 21:47:24 -0400 Received: from szxga07-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.35]:34886 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725829AbfFRBrX (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jun 2019 21:47:23 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS412-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 60CF686CD082B136A475; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 09:47:21 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.151.23.176] (10.151.23.176) by smtp.huawei.com (10.3.19.212) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 09:47:11 +0800 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] staging: erofs: decompression inplace approach To: Greg Kroah-Hartman CC: , , , LKML , , Fang Wei , , Miao Xie References: <20190614181619.64905-1-gaoxiang25@huawei.com> <20190617203609.GA22034@kroah.com> From: Gao Xiang Message-ID: Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 09:47:08 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190617203609.GA22034@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.151.23.176] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On 2019/6/18 4:36, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 02:16:11AM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote: >> At last, this is RFC patch v1, which means it is not suitable for >> merging soon... I'm still working on it, testing its stability >> these days and hope these patches get merged for 5.3 LTS >> (if 5.3 is a LTS version). > > Why would 5.3 be a LTS kernel? > > curious as to how you came up with that :) My personal thought is about one LTS kernel one year... Usually 5 versions after the previous kernel...(4.4 -> 4.9 -> 4.14 -> 4.19), which is not suitable for all historical LTSs...just prepare for 5.3... Thanks, Gao Xiang > > thanks, > > greg k-h >