From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Phillips Subject: Re: xfs: does mkfs.xfs require fancy switches to get decent =?iso-8859-1?Q?performance=3F_(was_Tux3_Report:_How_fast_can_we_fsync=3F)?= Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 13:38:24 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1804876.U7q4ey1Nv3@merkaba> <5553A805.5090601@phunq.net> <19913589.2sLSAqIcyD@merkaba> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Cc: David Lang , Theodore Ts'o , Howard Chu , Dave Chinner , , Mike Galbraith , Pavel Machek , , , OGAWA Hirofumi To: Martin Steigerwald Return-path: In-Reply-To: <19913589.2sLSAqIcyD@merkaba> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Wednesday, May 13, 2015 1:25:38 PM PDT, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 13. Mai 2015, 12:37:41 schrieb Daniel Phillips: >> On 05/13/2015 12:09 PM, Martin Steigerwald wrote: ... > > Daniel, if you want to change the process of patch review and > inclusion into > the kernel, model an example of how you would like it to be. This has way > better chances to inspire others to change their behaviors themselves than > accusing them of bad faith. > > Its yours to choose. > > What outcome do you want to create? The outcome I would like is: * Everybody has a good think about what has gone wrong in the past, not only with troublesome submitters, but with mutual respect and collegial conduct. * Tux3 is merged on its merits so we get more developers and testers and move it along faster. * I left LKML better than I found it. * Group hugs Well, group hugs are optional, that one would be situational. Regards, Daniel