From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Phillips Subject: Re: xfs: does mkfs.xfs require fancy switches to get decent =?iso-8859-1?Q?performance=3F_(was_Tux3_Report:_How_fast_can_we_fsync=3F)?= Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 13:24:12 -0700 Message-ID: References: <5552A844.6070806@phunq.net> <1804876.U7q4ey1Nv3@merkaba> <5553A805.5090601@phunq.net> <20150513200234.GB10059@samba2> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Cc: Martin Steigerwald , David Lang , Theodore Ts'o , Howard Chu , Dave Chinner , , Mike Galbraith , Pavel Machek , , , OGAWA Hirofumi To: Jeremy Allison Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150513200234.GB10059@samba2> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Wednesday, May 13, 2015 1:02:34 PM PDT, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 12:37:41PM -0700, Daniel Phillips wrote: >> On 05/13/2015 12:09 PM, Martin Steigerwald wrote: >> ... > > Daniel, please listen to Martin. He speaks a fundamental truth > here. > > As you know, I am also interested in Tux3, and would love to > see it as a filesystem option for NAS servers using Samba. But > please think about the way you're interacting with people on the > list, and whether that makes this outcome more or less likely. Thanks Jeremy, that means more from you than anyone. Regards, Daniel