From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4C7EC433F5 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 19:05:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8980610F9 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 19:05:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231263AbhJMTHo (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Oct 2021 15:07:44 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:47882 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230313AbhJMTHn (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Oct 2021 15:07:43 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1634151939; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=7Eiv40w3h1hcVei6B4W9Y1LVqxQiJmLHN86qfNssdwM=; b=Qy/MziQgayqH+l0uGP9EP1DuU2JXIcSbRePwSybeZBS30+g6/TjDziLnREp34FNgtVSFeB i9HehentJWX90KjTbMr9DvTtVnxeYS/zKPtgCkzq75lBkjyyTrZsYKZiqjmHr3UaoalbkZ RXsOUdreW7Kg+XHnI9jN0K3HE+eZwuw= Received: from mail-ed1-f69.google.com (mail-ed1-f69.google.com [209.85.208.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-98-D2OwmS5HO9CXwTz8BiW2-A-1; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 15:05:35 -0400 X-MC-Unique: D2OwmS5HO9CXwTz8BiW2-A-1 Received: by mail-ed1-f69.google.com with SMTP id e14-20020a056402088e00b003db6ebb9526so3054478edy.22 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:05:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=7Eiv40w3h1hcVei6B4W9Y1LVqxQiJmLHN86qfNssdwM=; b=0FO0u1HMA21aoOaZt5FedfA/Rz3esxSWWeZTVC/EkDIfW9Bop/XHQoykXFvp8eT7Iv UrxAoU9xI6pk0F2Z1CQYPt3Bck/BVQcN9FrizBHLh8gm2EEehnNQ6hcp9+bQYaEi5DEQ tb2mocew+34rHLfCRJPd0+y57KypYmX3HwSmAKpr1MZy79QtRXhjqXQI1xPBZxt4F/H/ LZcmpGuNcVO2Iik3+gB5J+UX4i7hOnU71k/7E2kV3iWOPiB/QkEi1RPcNL7OHTnsspQH kG61VV0SikAOpvbS4cjFNWv2S5rjzdkZSgQ7iNWa7ddjJhp+O8B6Q/y9ZSSq6vLiUhhr f3Sg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Cs75zNBrUSAuIMiuuv9820F1cRs+CsYss68qpjC2QwkPaSSBQ oZ5b9U/ZPrQA6r7MDEloDWZZGxOpTVCp5UPvch8b0LpQ0dAwzJR8BMCF4UskyfKSQC5KYVmV7je YQy/LH+hXT9lUPBWo6ZOG9+8JDQ== X-Received: by 2002:a50:bf02:: with SMTP id f2mr1748877edk.226.1634151934610; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:05:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzmcKV0CYPqwd/mDtR926wvJB++ZYNsP6Vx3CrliwDx64dKP6XU/wrZXnneZ49I7EzdutDhVQ== X-Received: by 2002:a50:bf02:: with SMTP id f2mr1748397edk.226.1634151931214; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:05:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2001:b07:6468:f312:c8dd:75d4:99ab:290a? ([2001:b07:6468:f312:c8dd:75d4:99ab:290a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r22sm278778ejd.109.2021.10.13.12.05.27 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:05:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 21:05:25 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.1.0 Subject: Re: kvm crash in 5.14.1? Content-Language: en-US To: Salvatore Bonaccorso , Stephen Cc: djwong@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, seanjc@google.com, rppt@kernel.org, James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@redhat.com, hagen@jauu.net References: <85e40141-3c17-1dff-1ed0-b016c5d778b6@gmail.com> <2cd8af17-8631-44b5-8580-371527beeb38@gmail.com> From: Paolo Bonzini In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On 13/10/21 21:00, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Oct 09, 2021 at 12:00:39PM -0700, Stephen wrote: >>> I'll try to report back if I see a crash; or in roughly a week if the >> system seems to have stabilized. >> >> Just wanted to provide a follow-up here and say that I've run on both >> v5.14.8 and v5.14.9 with this patch and everything seems to be good; no >> further crashes or problems. > > In Debian we got a report as well related to this issue (cf. > https://bugs.debian.org/996175). Do you know did the patch felt > through the cracks? Yeah, it's not a KVM patch so the mm maintainers didn't see it. I'll handle it tomorrow. Paolo