From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
Daniel Colascione <dancol@google.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] /proc/stat: Reduce irqs counting performance overhead
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 13:03:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f6302369-9eda-ef58-4f18-3dc9ffbc31f1@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190109174403.GN6310@bombadil.infradead.org>
On 01/09/2019 12:44 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 12:23:44PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
>> This v2 patch optimizes the way the IRQ counts are retrieved and computed
>> and getting rid of the sysctl parameter altogether to achieve a performance
>> gain that is close to the v1 patch. This is based on the idea that while
>> many IRQs can be supported by a system, only a handful of them are actually
>> being used in most cases. We can save a lot of time by focusing on those
>> active IRQs only and ignore the rests.
> So your reaction to being told "Make this the same as every other thing
> we have to sum across all CPUs" is to make it _even more different_ and
> special-cased? I'm done. NAK.
The paragraph above may be a bit misleading. This v2 patch actually
touches very little on percpu accounting aspect of the IRQ counts. See
patches 2 and 3 for the relevant changes which is just a few line of new
codes. Please review the individual patches before Nak'ing.
I could theoretically generalize them into a new set of percpu counting
helpers, but the idea behind it is quite different from the use cases of
percpu counter. So it may not be a good idea of adding it to there.
Cheers,
Longman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-09 18:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-09 17:23 [PATCH v2 0/4] /proc/stat: Reduce irqs counting performance overhead Waiman Long
2019-01-09 17:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] /proc/stat: Extract irqs counting code into show_stat_irqs() Waiman Long
2019-01-09 17:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] /proc/stat: Only do percpu sum of active IRQs Waiman Long
2019-01-09 17:23 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] genirq: Track the number " Waiman Long
2019-01-09 17:23 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] /proc/stat: Call kstat_irqs_usr() only for " Waiman Long
2019-01-09 17:23 ` Waiman Long
2019-01-09 17:39 ` Waiman Long
2019-01-09 17:44 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] /proc/stat: Reduce irqs counting performance overhead Matthew Wilcox
2019-01-09 18:03 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2019-01-09 18:24 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-01-09 18:37 ` Waiman Long
2019-01-09 18:52 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-01-09 18:57 ` Waiman Long
2019-01-09 18:54 ` Waiman Long
2019-01-09 19:59 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-01-09 19:59 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-01-09 20:14 ` Waiman Long
2019-01-09 20:14 ` Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f6302369-9eda-ef58-4f18-3dc9ffbc31f1@redhat.com \
--to=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dancol@google.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).