procfs: open("/proc/self/fd/...") allows bypassing O_RDONLY

From: Simon Ser <contact@emersion.fr>
To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: procfs: open("/proc/self/fd/...") allows bypassing O_RDONLY
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 10:37:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <lGo7a4qQABKb-u_xsz6p-QtLIy2bzciBLTUJ7-ksv7ppK3mRrJhXqFmCFU4AtQf6EyrZUrYuSLDMBHEUMe5st_iT9VcRuyYPMU_jVpSzoWg=@emersion.fr> (raw)

Hi all,

I'm a user-space developer working on Wayland. Recently we've been
discussing about security considerations related to FD passing between
processes [1].

A Wayland compositor often needs to share read-only data with its
clients. Examples include a keyboard keymap, or a pixel format table.
The clients might be untrusted. The data sharing can happen by having
the compositor send a read-only FD (ie, a FD opened with O_RDONLY) to
clients.

It was assumed that passing such a FD wouldn't allow Wayland clients to
write to the file. However, it was recently discovered that procfs
allows to bypass this restriction. A process can open(2)
"/proc/self/fd/<fd>" with O_RDWR, and that will return a FD suitable for
writing. This also works when running the client inside a user namespace.
A PoC is available at [2] and can be tested inside a compositor which
uses this O_RDONLY strategy (e.g. wlroots compositors).

Question: is this intended behavior, or is this an oversight? If this is
intended behavior, what would be a good way to share a FD to another
process without allowing it to write to the underlying file?

Thanks,

Simon

[1]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland-protocols/-/issues/92
[2]: https://paste.sr.ht/~emersion/eac94b03f286e21f8362354b6af032291c00f8a7