From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/20] Sysfs cleanups Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 16:04:48 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20090520153718.GB26111@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo , Cornelia Huck , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Greg KH Return-path: Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.232]:36241 "EHLO out02.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753548AbZETXE4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 May 2009 19:04:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090520153718.GB26111@suse.de> (Greg KH's message of "Wed\, 20 May 2009 08\:37\:18 -0700") Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Greg KH writes: > On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 09:09:43PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> >> The following patch series cleans up sysfs to the point where itq is >> generally a good citizen of the vfs layer. The big theme is lazy >> synchronization from the sysfs data structures to the vfs data >> structures using the same techniques as most other distributed >> filesystems. > > Hm, I only seem to have gotten patch 0/20, none of the actual patches. > Did I somehow miss them? > > confused, Me too. git-send-email ran. I got copies of the mail sent. But fsdevel and linux-kernel appears not to have received them. Hopefully I can figure out what went wrong shortly. My apologies if anyone receives several copies. Eric