From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60ECBC4360C for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 23:56:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26C9F20674 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 23:56:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="ZkSsZNUh" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728792AbfJHX4d (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Oct 2019 19:56:33 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-f194.google.com ([209.85.210.194]:38823 "EHLO mail-pf1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726068AbfJHX4d (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Oct 2019 19:56:33 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f194.google.com with SMTP id h195so380027pfe.5 for ; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 16:56:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=XVUnqR8YwY7D80De60aqeQY4ilI5PZL2gpltHrG9Dj4=; b=ZkSsZNUhy6+pWMRU/J228sGdal2XGBcUV9l8XKJ3AylmyUKwj974f440TyC+YQIydS fmoS5nMUhBQLpSZfS/DitAIsAK97H2ufa1z3sFrDUGRKMWKWtM4csZZ3ONp8bJPOOHYH tLQo30LsqBEWA8tye2vvK4Y92iqcjHXG5Ryb69MBdoZRxMrwBOG5X1KTKtE5cfdsVeGo c7W6uzrLGzFUSNLYht+eBvrDxGoDbDU0dlwNAPn4OjBqdXuh9jJacSCoIFwH6YJuZvQg OJs0Yr7LciY3ht6A0IG6vteFXM4jDBAZ16GkVnDahrlrfcaPAlANiYu55C1F+WMebstI qWqA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=XVUnqR8YwY7D80De60aqeQY4ilI5PZL2gpltHrG9Dj4=; b=gWyBnmLqui9+0PiXjWsTCzFG9VYZYK5xZGKZRg3x6ljWv6+0ECjkkYzfnMOiIO+plF XAARJdI6HOMXQRfFvGhE51mh9lVG4ID5tpAksYa1hrW65Kv4Sop6JpUqP13R9GctTdM1 5t9XTgHpnc4SiKqxmEP9aLOK/bpOH/jhk0Uk0KRT15oSuNJ84k+CimL8gLrXb/d8UFXc b9ULTIbJHGpy73b4XwPWgvnBk9DBQC3ik+LSFC6VsdW56zrrGuM/TiHboAw34SL9Y6GZ veB4ZL6okSvd+WB6O9c3+4/CpWQK2b3zFuCK6xlxI5L8EX2pmkTXZsMtH3vMgYri4Fen 7VIA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUpTqh2nRAMCBr/2QdXQubnGrJmw1CXDIp0gQ/Y8NvrhrJvuacA /cPQMtbl+4B+86A8Y5N25ZJmy3E0DCXzVg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyrfSP/cE32LVgCwgBShNaZXMRg+dYnFAI3G9RPowXHDGz8SBI5roU7i+iMeYmsZkWZSZeh/A== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:71c9:: with SMTP id m9mr575579pjs.56.1570578991998; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 16:56:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sol (220-235-84-126.dyn.iinet.net.au. [220.235.84.126]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c64sm220778pfc.19.2019.10.08.16.56.28 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 08 Oct 2019 16:56:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 07:56:26 +0800 From: Kent Gibson To: Bartosz Golaszewski Cc: Drew Fustini , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , Linus Walleij , Thomas Petazzoni Subject: Re: [RFC] gpio: expose pull-up/pull-down line flags to userspace Message-ID: <20191008235626.GA10744@sol> References: <20190921102522.8970-1-drew@pdp7.com> <20191008061512.GA19956@sol> <20191008232120.GA9225@sol> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 01:30:18AM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > śr., 9 paź 2019 o 01:21 Kent Gibson napisał(a): > > > > On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 10:56:18PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > > wt., 8 paź 2019 o 08:15 Kent Gibson napisał(a): > > > > > > > > On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 12:25:23PM +0200, Drew Fustini wrote: > > > > > Add pull-up/pull-down flags to the gpio line get and > > > > > set ioctl() calls. Use cases include a push button > > > > > that does not have an external resistor. > > > > > > > > > > Addition use cases described by Limor Fried (ladyada) of > > > > > Adafruit in this PR for Adafruit_Blinka Python lib: > > > > > https://github.com/adafruit/Adafruit_Blinka/pull/59 > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Drew Fustini > > > > > --- > > > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 12 ++++++++++++ > > > > > include/uapi/linux/gpio.h | 4 ++++ > > > > > 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c > > > > > index d9074191edef..9da1093cc7f5 100644 > > > > > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c > > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c > > > > > @@ -427,6 +427,8 @@ struct linehandle_state { > > > > > (GPIOHANDLE_REQUEST_INPUT | \ > > > > > GPIOHANDLE_REQUEST_OUTPUT | \ > > > > > GPIOHANDLE_REQUEST_ACTIVE_LOW | \ > > > > > + GPIOHANDLE_REQUEST_PULL_UP | \ > > > > > + GPIOHANDLE_REQUEST_PULL_DOWN | \ > > > > > GPIOHANDLE_REQUEST_OPEN_DRAIN | \ > > > > > GPIOHANDLE_REQUEST_OPEN_SOURCE) > > > > > > > > > > @@ -598,6 +600,10 @@ static int linehandle_create(struct gpio_device *gdev, void __user *ip) > > > > > set_bit(FLAG_OPEN_DRAIN, &desc->flags); > > > > > if (lflags & GPIOHANDLE_REQUEST_OPEN_SOURCE) > > > > > set_bit(FLAG_OPEN_SOURCE, &desc->flags); > > > > > + if (lflags & GPIOHANDLE_REQUEST_PULL_DOWN) > > > > > + set_bit(FLAG_PULL_DOWN, &desc->flags); > > > > > + if (lflags & GPIOHANDLE_REQUEST_PULL_UP) > > > > > + set_bit(FLAG_PULL_UP, &desc->flags); > > > > > > > > > > ret = gpiod_set_transitory(desc, false); > > > > > if (ret < 0) > > > > > @@ -1102,6 +1108,10 @@ static long gpio_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg) > > > > > if (test_bit(FLAG_OPEN_SOURCE, &desc->flags)) > > > > > lineinfo.flags |= (GPIOLINE_FLAG_OPEN_SOURCE | > > > > > GPIOLINE_FLAG_IS_OUT); > > > > > + if (test_bit(FLAG_PULL_DOWN, &desc->flags)) > > > > > + lineinfo.flags |= GPIOLINE_FLAG_PULL_DOWN; > > > > > + if (test_bit(FLAG_PULL_UP, &desc->flags)) > > > > > + lineinfo.flags |= GPIOLINE_FLAG_PULL_UP; > > > > > > > > > > if (copy_to_user(ip, &lineinfo, sizeof(lineinfo))) > > > > > return -EFAULT; > > > > > @@ -2475,6 +2485,8 @@ static bool gpiod_free_commit(struct gpio_desc *desc) > > > > > clear_bit(FLAG_REQUESTED, &desc->flags); > > > > > clear_bit(FLAG_OPEN_DRAIN, &desc->flags); > > > > > clear_bit(FLAG_OPEN_SOURCE, &desc->flags); > > > > > + clear_bit(FLAG_PULL_UP, &desc->flags); > > > > > + clear_bit(FLAG_PULL_DOWN, &desc->flags); > > > > > clear_bit(FLAG_IS_HOGGED, &desc->flags); > > > > > ret = true; > > > > > } > > > > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/gpio.h b/include/uapi/linux/gpio.h > > > > > index 4ebfe0ac6c5b..c2d1f7d908d6 100644 > > > > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/gpio.h > > > > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/gpio.h > > > > > @@ -33,6 +33,8 @@ struct gpiochip_info { > > > > > #define GPIOLINE_FLAG_ACTIVE_LOW (1UL << 2) > > > > > #define GPIOLINE_FLAG_OPEN_DRAIN (1UL << 3) > > > > > #define GPIOLINE_FLAG_OPEN_SOURCE (1UL << 4) > > > > > +#define GPIOLINE_FLAG_PULL_UP (1UL << 5) > > > > > +#define GPIOLINE_FLAG_PULL_DOWN (1UL << 6) > > > > > > > > > > /** > > > > > * struct gpioline_info - Information about a certain GPIO line > > > > > @@ -62,6 +64,8 @@ struct gpioline_info { > > > > > #define GPIOHANDLE_REQUEST_ACTIVE_LOW (1UL << 2) > > > > > #define GPIOHANDLE_REQUEST_OPEN_DRAIN (1UL << 3) > > > > > #define GPIOHANDLE_REQUEST_OPEN_SOURCE (1UL << 4) > > > > > +#define GPIOHANDLE_REQUEST_PULL_UP (1UL << 5) > > > > > +#define GPIOHANDLE_REQUEST_PULL_DOWN (1UL << 6) > > > > > > > > > > /** > > > > > * struct gpiohandle_request - Information about a GPIO handle request > > > > > -- > > > > > 2.20.1 > > > > > > > > > Sorry for the late feedback, but I'm still not sure whether this patch > > > > is on track to be applied or not. I had thought not, at least not yet, > > > > but just in case... > > > > > > > > > > It still needs some fixes, but Linus seems to be fine with the general idea. > > > > > > > You have added the flags to linehandle_create, but not lineevent_create. > > > > Given that your primary use case is push buttons, isn't the event request > > > > at least as important as the handle request? Even ignoring your use > > > > case, I'd add them to lineevent_create just to maintain symmetry. > > > > > > > > Also, is it valid to set PULL_UP and PULL_DOWN simulaneously? > > > > I would think not, but I could be wrong. > > > > If not then that combination should be rejected with EINVAL. > > > > > > > > > > Yes, some validity checks of the flags must be added. I even did it in > > > my local branch[1]. > > > > > Your changes for linehandle_create look ok, but for lineevent_create > > you explicitly disabled PULL_UP and PULL_DOWN, and in a block labelled > > "This is just wrong: we don't look for events on output lines" at that. > > > > Yeah, feel free to change it. > Yeah, you see I didn't feel free to change it, as I thought the appropriate etiquette was to send comments to the original author. At least until the patch has been applied. Or are RFCs a special case? > > > Re: direction and configuration changes on requested lines: I think > > > it's quite useful to add in the form of a new ioctl(): > > > GPIOHANDLE_SET_CONFIG_IOCTL or something. I started hacking on this > > > but eventually got more busy this week than I anticipated. I'm still > > > planning on sending an RFC by the end of the week though. > > > > > I have the reverse problem - bored and looking for something to do, so > > more than willing to help out - if you want it. > > > > Sure, in that case let's just wait for your patches. You can just > extend what I started, if you wish. > Yep, you sound tired. Are we talking about the SET_CONFIG here? If you have a link to what you've started I'll take a look, but as I've already said - I'm not about to go writing new ioctls without approval and guidance from you and Linus. If you have the ioctl defined I'm happy to take it from there. Well happy-ish. > > And while we're talking, does the gpio-mockup support pull up/down > > being set from the kernel side? > > > > No, but feel free to add it. > Ok, will have a look - cos I would like to add tests for the above and that will require the mockup supporting it as well. Cheers, Kent.