From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C612FC433E0 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 21:11:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B047A206F1 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 21:11:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730211AbgF2TAL (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jun 2020 15:00:11 -0400 Received: from muru.com ([72.249.23.125]:59960 "EHLO muru.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728088AbgF2TAK (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jun 2020 15:00:10 -0400 Received: from atomide.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muru.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D90A5819C; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 16:32:16 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 09:31:21 -0700 From: Tony Lindgren To: Drew Fustini Cc: Rob Herring , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Linus Walleij , Haojian Zhuang , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, bcousson@baylibre.com, Jason Kridner , Robert Nelson Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] pinctrl: single: support #pinctrl-cells = 2 Message-ID: <20200629163121.GS37466@atomide.com> References: <20200622172951.524306-1-drew@beagleboard.org> <20200629122858.GA506802@x1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200629122858.GA506802@x1> Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org * Drew Fustini [200629 12:29]: > Hi Tony - do you think this series is useful as-is? > > Or do you want to see some usage of the seperate conf and mux values > first? Hmm to me it seems you should squash patches 2 and 3 together as otherwise git bisect will fail to boot probably at patch 2. Regards, Tony