On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 01:17:04PM +0200, Baruch Siach wrote: > Round up the result of division in period/duty_cycle calculation to make > the result closer to idempotent. > > Reported-by: Uwe Kleine-König > Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach > --- > drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c > index c424d88e9e2b..6fc64846eda3 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c > @@ -668,7 +668,7 @@ static void mvebu_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, > > regmap_read(mvpwm->regs, mvebu_pwmreg_blink_on_duration(mvpwm), &u); > val = (unsigned long long) u * NSEC_PER_SEC; > - do_div(val, mvpwm->clk_rate); > + val = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(val, mvpwm->clk_rate); > if (val > UINT_MAX) > state->duty_cycle = UINT_MAX; > else if (val) > @@ -680,7 +680,7 @@ static void mvebu_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, > regmap_read(mvpwm->regs, mvebu_pwmreg_blink_off_duration(mvpwm), &u); > val += (unsigned long long) u; /* period = on + off duration */ > val *= NSEC_PER_SEC; > - do_div(val, mvpwm->clk_rate); > + val = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(val, mvpwm->clk_rate); > if (val > UINT_MAX) > state->period = UINT_MAX; > else if (val) > @@ -707,7 +707,7 @@ static int mvebu_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, > unsigned int on, off; > > val = (unsigned long long) mvpwm->clk_rate * state->duty_cycle; > - do_div(val, NSEC_PER_SEC); > + val = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(val, NSEC_PER_SEC); .apply must continue to round down. Best regards Uwe > if (val > UINT_MAX) > return -EINVAL; > if (val) > @@ -716,7 +716,7 @@ static int mvebu_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, > on = 1; > > val = (unsigned long long) mvpwm->clk_rate * state->period; > - do_div(val, NSEC_PER_SEC); > + val = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(val, NSEC_PER_SEC); > val -= on; > if (val > UINT_MAX) > return -EINVAL; > -- > 2.29.2 > > -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |