From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1723AC433E0 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 07:54:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB8F925487 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 07:54:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=microchip.com header.i=@microchip.com header.b="gLv6Z26W" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731475AbgFVHyV (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jun 2020 03:54:21 -0400 Received: from esa5.microchip.iphmx.com ([216.71.150.166]:45228 "EHLO esa5.microchip.iphmx.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731412AbgFVHyU (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jun 2020 03:54:20 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=microchip.com; i=@microchip.com; q=dns/txt; s=mchp; t=1592812460; x=1624348460; h=references:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date: message-id:mime-version; bh=MmOrVI6xag5zI5id2G6sN9KnqWs1OFqBibVoZnsiqI4=; b=gLv6Z26WBwgctTX9EM/XjrQar0m3qVJnAOtUet3JBaNhIDvNsfBeeH84 TSTDnIcw1uWpT0ZQHtLwexMF9r/tXE7YOTGG0ozFyj6LpPJL1fykPSz10 Wmzp0B1w1AS7YiGCqAkXm+Utq/8CVdmNSxPj1kP/vofbMfksipv+ESRhl aoZPnc/tz4BlyJqBTv2r5iv96SC4peKkAiQLzMgzpob8NzsAtom27r8q3 cqCrJECN8/C84EgSpdRJMHZ7sMDCkOLUBBcZEM+lPrAkRZ8v5Sd9iuMKO LACgR9IHVFvipj/v5XQEMLIOYIa09tHhDuO5HtkO7mMxPNwfX9rKHb2GF A==; IronPort-SDR: uviGtuAC0yFKNGjCzU1nNdXKCv1JIyywNhcjNHt1jYuWmqd11nW6KCYOVSvoMHjyy6KLvvsd7T kP7PdQH8Hj6a5hyVbf5z/73Hk7FztHPga06w9xvRl5OMv53VdDOsSoMjBu8tvHJcEJ/+035bsF P1a1DPIE5tB7hQw7E6PQVEpp+WDb0UuvZrfaLHag7qgK8XbcqBO97bskPXEyA7zM5Y7O2NSL2I MAXf/TXTmO94IxGtj/tQqkGiitJYeqknTK+pGXjbkLjjDScTRC8tLvYVaoxsbdDMYuubbXSApu 3OI= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,266,1589266800"; d="scan'208";a="80326237" Received: from smtpout.microchip.com (HELO email.microchip.com) ([198.175.253.82]) by esa5.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA256; 22 Jun 2020 00:54:19 -0700 Received: from chn-vm-ex02.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.144) by chn-vm-ex01.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.143) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1979.3; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 00:54:08 -0700 Received: from soft-dev15.microsemi.net.microchip.com (10.10.115.15) by chn-vm-ex02.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 00:54:05 -0700 References: <20200615133242.24911-1-lars.povlsen@microchip.com> <20200615133242.24911-6-lars.povlsen@microchip.com> From: Lars Povlsen To: Linus Walleij List-Id: CC: Lars Povlsen , SoC Team , "Arnd Bergmann" , Stephen Boyd , Steen Hegelund , Microchip Linux Driver Support , Olof Johansson , "Michael Turquette" , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , linux-clk , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , Linux ARM , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Alexandre Belloni Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/10] pinctrl: ocelot: Add Sparx5 SoC support In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:54:09 +0200 Message-ID: <87k0zzy1r2.fsf@soft-dev15.microsemi.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org Linus Walleij writes: > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 3:33 PM Lars Povlsen wrote: > >> This add support for Sparx5 pinctrl, using the ocelot drives as >> basis. It adds pinconfig support as well, as supported by the >> platform. >> >> Reviewed-by: Alexandre Belloni >> Signed-off-by: Lars Povlsen > > Is it fine if I just apply this driver to the pinctrl tree? > Otherwise Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij Hi Linus! Yes it would be fine with me for sure... Thank you very much. ---Lars > > Yours, > Linus Walleij -- Lars Povlsen, Microchip