From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60E19C433FF for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 08:11:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A4232064A for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 08:11:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="Lhpl/4CE" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730003AbfHOILA (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Aug 2019 04:11:00 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-f193.google.com ([209.85.208.193]:47071 "EHLO mail-lj1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726120AbfHOILA (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Aug 2019 04:11:00 -0400 Received: by mail-lj1-f193.google.com with SMTP id f9so1480815ljc.13 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 01:10:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=8ebZA4/36rTxk/8zZnnGDTrAggtxlqN1B3xHCFNWBeg=; b=Lhpl/4CEOGdOAaUNVwfrFhEAvqDwbWuwmeCdhVlfhEZ4/EggH2nWpO8VyBdh8S3QLQ OXSjlscVTA0qX+4UtPYPdHZjLezQc1CMoaTTVEu/eEyI/1PY5ti4rNjbAsJDxz0U6m7Y rjkKnJ6lf4g2Q3tSWZxq3+ho22XDefURjkSV/EoglAd+kIXMVbqLGLj5VifjQ7udmyD/ 3lGQdWxU4oagagD4Sia2hN4cadPANHBfSlqe61KnNKLr97BDHpR9kBE1zDPYM2593NWe 9/gq0LzoU/SBXdrT+TCXSCGU756D2pyjwdjOPkwqWBlcqHAAOQK1KCn8eunhI1124UQJ XUVg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=8ebZA4/36rTxk/8zZnnGDTrAggtxlqN1B3xHCFNWBeg=; b=SiAkPORRhNLVZKdHcvQguOA08sJU5kwFweSAnMJyyi1cAzomcKc5iE/RHEuVOR81DC ligyUN5MXzcO1TimfihbGsxbF+EJrJ1TgplX4oLdDhH1pjDctHO8QAjDi40xhYhuMQTx dMW0QO/5clqv13pQsNu75kZGNIQ8nLW4Cj+MD75IbcDVQqm3AEI1WyQFPB68+UuLmpA9 jdOwt5keaTsAKrSoN7N9ZnjlO95GvZsbqKOuZkS72Jd6De1RMWkflM9dVKuF5z7tIfIu LuGbaZrBVIsdir5XSwsyWK2fAg0JhtJWduR7+9fBhEczXfAqaVx9UDW5FaK8Wqr3NWq7 fxkw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWCWgK977qeM/1PIGN17xN2hoadb3oQqTFet+bDOyCTy2C6Fvjm 36zFpg3dUMKxxU9VYWQYEhjMed/XgARJz1/epD7o8Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw6nViHWAm98n06wtqmOkZygSxdicck4ta/i4U+OsaEfdC8l5tbW8rAx23zMzUJLlAWup0/GRhMtmPLdCvoD50= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9f0f:: with SMTP id u15mr2017156ljk.54.1565856658315; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 01:10:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190805101607.29811-1-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> <20190814143457.664b04c8@windsurf.home> In-Reply-To: <20190814143457.664b04c8@windsurf.home> From: Linus Walleij Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 10:10:46 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] CP115 pinctrl support To: Thomas Petazzoni Cc: Miquel Raynal , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , Gregory Clement , Antoine Tenart , Maxime Chevallier , Nadav Haklai , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , Linux ARM , Grzegorz Jaszczyk , Marcin Wojtas , Stefan Chulski , Yan Markman Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 2:35 PM Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 10:12:36 +0200 > Linus Walleij wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 2:47 PM Linus Walleij wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 12:16 PM Miquel Raynal wrote: > > > > > > > This is the second batch of changes (out of three) to support the brand > > > > new Marvell CN9130 SoCs which are made of one AP807 and one CP115. > > > > > > > > We add a new compatible (and the relevant support in the pinctrl > > > > driver) before the addition in batch 3/3 of CN9130 SoCs DT using it. > > > > > > Waiting for review from the Mvebu maintainers. > > > > > > If it takes too long just nudge me, it looks good to me. > > > > So if the other MVEBU maintainers don't really look much at MVEBU > > patches anymore while Miquel is working a lot on the platform, > > what about listing Miquel as maintainer under the SoC entry, hm? > > Miquel sent his series on August 5, i.e 9 days ago. We're in August, in > the middle of the summer vacations for many people. While it is nice to > see subsystem maintainers who want to get code merged in a timely > fashion, I think it is probably wise to give it some more time for > review in this period of the year. OK then maybe I am a bit impatient. Yours, Linus Walleij