From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
To: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
Sai Krishna Potthuri <lakshmi.sai.krishna.potthuri@xilinx.com>
Subject: Re: DT overlay applied via pinctrl description
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2021 10:19:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZEYqPU6Zr+a6fivZiz-hKx6-KVdYVR7j--y+k2KXZaPw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <63d610ba-5f63-2be1-6215-f44bd88d94d2@xilinx.com>
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 4:35 PM Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> wrote:
> I have a question about expectations when pinctrl setting is applied. In
> DTS all nodes are described in the order available in DT.
>
> uart-default {
> mux {
> ...
> };
>
> conf {
> ...
> };
> };
>
> I don't know if this standard description or not. I definitely see other
> pinctrl drivers which are using different structure.
>
> Anyway when overlay is applied the order has changed to
> uart-default {
> conf {
> ...
> };
>
> mux {
> ...
> };
> };
>
> which is causing issue because pin is configured first via conf node
> before it is requested via mux. This is something what firmware is
> checking and error out.
As Frank says the DT ordering has no semantic meaning, it is essentially
a functional language, describes object relations not sequences.
The Linux kernel applies the mux and conf in that order because of how
the code is implemented (this order also makes a lot of sense for the
hardware). I would recommend to trace the execution of an overlay
being applied and try to find the reason conf goes before mux and fix
the bug there. I think it is a bug in how pinctrl handles DT overlays.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-01 9:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-16 15:35 DT overlay applied via pinctrl description Michal Simek
2021-02-17 5:33 ` Frank Rowand
2021-03-01 9:19 ` Linus Walleij [this message]
2021-03-01 9:31 ` Michal Simek
2021-03-01 14:13 ` Linus Walleij
2021-03-01 15:04 ` Michal Simek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CACRpkdZEYqPU6Zr+a6fivZiz-hKx6-KVdYVR7j--y+k2KXZaPw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=lakshmi.sai.krishna.potthuri@xilinx.com \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.simek@xilinx.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).