From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67CB8C433E1 for ; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 21:07:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BF5720725 for ; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 21:07:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="JkFrPEBf" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727932AbgGKVHm (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Jul 2020 17:07:42 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43502 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726281AbgGKVHm (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Jul 2020 17:07:42 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x143.google.com (mail-lf1-x143.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::143]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3310C08C5DD for ; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 14:07:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x143.google.com with SMTP id k17so5169434lfg.3 for ; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 14:07:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=k4nruq+oFiOvqyvb4/VdyM/ZTJbNZf/NdW35w9sc1Vw=; b=JkFrPEBfH8dagE1gbcrczR+NaJRYTz6akXcZnsC2ggF2HTLUZaJhU0SQhevq7SR9A8 TOJvCa3mY07asVGgE2VAD20RElrOPt6KCtSjgGMlvTB3YKaQxIMxfIDiEDcggO6YGOdz PM5yAGQkvoDKcKEQOJ344MZ0oFVlyliO9Vsii66zWJ2UdnmumhsVl6/CabNCg4sCK9GX GgwXoF+gE/rmqAd9/bYsBcnF0GogprDeJJ17LniiVoWsnHw/HV8H+hvJ2m+wvkEULTEa n6mGiKnXpvUMGeTuKpKWzKhSeJRyMYXXYcBkceT87oGMqAFowaOLvj5q82JYPQO0Yu0F 0mLA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=k4nruq+oFiOvqyvb4/VdyM/ZTJbNZf/NdW35w9sc1Vw=; b=bywcjlE0AQnmo4L55wyYMa4YDyzlSWPw4iqN/nfELK3NGXbZnrnGiL+EuZhPU4ToBd 8S/QjTIO8Ism108Rp69gSSCPZfWVnc36szASdsEsTuW/9M6Cu4EiCQVR/aXVhvaoK1zZ QlMdTifuGjyxsFVprybZIimwiXdj6xDAFvLPEQeyXUA6OEw19jVDwtDiPq42P5rRGo9l AdBaRx9rBYItUsxJJVci6jFiSCSN3rXVB+zi8XrmGXh721k8Fw8sC7NsnHl7w98+7KjU ahSgQSZ7zUwLRtQiDBijzqMknW5P77xiMlUHvIvd3AZwg0570FCmzLnSbXhRQNif6SMN lAFA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533MT70YvDSX76AW6Jshat2k5Z1NtCS1VC9Tre0pBzmh0nKRONr6 EY4a2K9mtIe7KgCQtmcFBTPw1j4WmsySu1OMg2G238bYDNw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyDiDsK12IuwKtw/dVRn5YAY+IfXPlqFWGCjxLbFu5B1b6OC79zeGSpRTe7ZBdq9RgfyCwrSSqQp7SJJDFTsQE= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3150:: with SMTP id s16mr36960881lfi.47.1594501660354; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 14:07:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200630212958.24030-1-mark.tomlinson@alliedtelesis.co.nz> <760595a8cdfeb0156d5180ecaeb2ee4487f50cc7.camel@alliedtelesis.co.nz> <86c009a8-05c4-40a3-daef-6d9e848642a3@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Linus Walleij Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2020 23:07:29 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: initialise nsp-mux earlier. To: Florian Fainelli Cc: Mark Tomlinson , "ray.jui@broadcom.com" , "bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com" , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , "sbranden@broadcom.com" , "rjui@broadcom.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 6:44 AM Florian Fainelli wrote: > On 6/30/2020 9:37 PM, Mark Tomlinson wrote: > > That was one of my thoughts too. I found someone had tried that > > earlier, but it was rejected: > > > > > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-gpio/patch/1516566774-1786-1-git-send-email-david@lechnology.com/ > > clk or reset APIs do not complain loudly on EPROBE_DEFER, it seems to me > that GPIO should follow here. Also, it does look like Linus was in > agreement in the end, not sure why it was not applied though. I never got an updated patch. My last message was: >> so you mean something like this? >> >> if (err == -EPROBE_DEFER) >> dev_info(dev, "deferring probe\n") >> else >> dev_err(dev, "... failed to register\n") > > Yes exactly. Patches welcome :D Yours, Linus Walleij