linux-gpio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Cc: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
	Khouloud Touil <ktouil@baylibre.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] gpiolib: use kref in gpio_desc
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 21:50:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdaPwfpfDJ2CjGCVFbMvXaSnCXaisvb2N-edeZO0Tbkssw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMRc=Mf2Mx+rB7du8D66WP=Js0wuK8x44aT9H2q6JhLJvrOcVQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 3:47 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote:
> czw., 12 mar 2020 o 11:35 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> napisał(a):

> In this case I was thinking about a situation where we pass a
> requested descriptor to some other framework (nvmem in this case)
> which internally doesn't know anything about who manages this resource
> externally. Now we can of course simply not do anything about it and
> expect the user (who passed us the descriptor) to handle the resources
> correctly. But what happens if the user releases the descriptor not on
> driver detach but somewhere else for whatever reason while nvmem
> doesn't know about it? It may try to use the descriptor which will now
> be invalid. Reference counting in this case would help IMHO.

I'm so confused because I keep believing it is reference counted
elsewhere.

struct gpio_desc *d always comes from the corresponding
struct gpio_device *descs array. This:

struct gpio_device {
        int                     id;
        struct device           dev;
(...)
        struct gpio_desc        *descs;
(...)

This array is allocated in gpiochip_add_data_with_key() like this:

        gdev->descs = kcalloc(chip->ngpio, sizeof(gdev->descs[0]), GFP_KERNEL);

Then it gets free:d in gpiodevice_release():

static void gpiodevice_release(struct device *dev)
{
        struct gpio_device *gdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
(...)
        kfree(gdev->descs);
        kfree(gdev);
}

This is the .release function for the gdev->dev, the device inside
struct gpio_device,
i.e. the same device that contains the descs in the first place. So it
is just living
and dying with the struct gpio_device.

struct gpio_device does *NOT* die in the devm_* destructor that gets called
when someone has e.g. added a gpiochip using devm_gpiochip_add_data().

I think the above observation is crucial: the lifetime of struct gpio_chip and
struct gpio_device are decoupled. When the struct gpio_chip dies, that
just "numbs" all gpio descriptors but they stay around along with the
struct gpio_device that contain them until the last
user is gone.

The struct gpio_device reference counted with the call to get_device(&gdev->dev)
in gpiod_request() which is on the path of gpiod_get_[index]().

If a consumer gets a gpio_desc using any gpiod_get* API this gets
increased and it gets decreased at every gpiod_put() or by the
managed resources.

So should you not rather exploit this fact and just add something
like:

void gpiod_reference(struct gpio_desc *desc)
{
    struct gpio_device *gdev;

    VALIDATE_DESC(desc);
    gdev = desc->gdev;
    get_device(&gdev->dev);
}

void gpiod_unreference(struct gpio_desc *desc)
{
    struct gpio_device *gdev;

    VALIDATE_DESC(desc);
    gdev = desc->gdev;
    put_device(&gdev->dev);
}

This should make sure the desc and the backing gpio_device
stays around until all references are gone.

NB: We also issue try_module_get() on the module that drives the
GPIO, which will make it impossible to unload that module while it
has active GPIOs. I think maybe the whole logic inside gpiod_request()
is needed to properly add an extra reference to a gpiod else someone
can (theoretically) pull out the module from below.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-26 20:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-24  9:41 [PATCH 0/3] gpiolib: add reference counting to GPIO descriptors Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-02-24  9:41 ` [PATCH 1/3] gpiolib: provide VALIDATE_DESC_PTR() macro Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-02-24  9:41 ` [PATCH 2/3] gpiolib: use kref in gpio_desc Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-03-05 16:49   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-03-12 10:10     ` Linus Walleij
2020-03-12 18:24       ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-03-13  8:43         ` Linus Walleij
2020-03-13 15:04           ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-03-23  8:44             ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-03-25 11:16               ` Linus Walleij
2020-03-25 11:35                 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-03-12 10:35   ` Linus Walleij
2020-03-13 14:47     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-03-26 20:50       ` Linus Walleij [this message]
2020-03-30 14:36         ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-05-14 13:42           ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-05-16  9:50             ` Linus Walleij
2020-02-24  9:41 ` [PATCH 3/3] nvmem: increase the reference count of a gpio passed over config Bartosz Golaszewski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CACRpkdaPwfpfDJ2CjGCVFbMvXaSnCXaisvb2N-edeZO0Tbkssw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
    --cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=ktouil@baylibre.com \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).