From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E5E1C43331 for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 21:14:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8AA220658 for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 21:14:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="qX+gRLGF" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727444AbgC0VON (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Mar 2020 17:14:13 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-f66.google.com ([209.85.167.66]:46422 "EHLO mail-lf1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727423AbgC0VON (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Mar 2020 17:14:13 -0400 Received: by mail-lf1-f66.google.com with SMTP id q5so9020927lfb.13 for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 14:14:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=XaIaaULbP3McQWHg8W+/o/1CYRBruKdNlh+486HcGCM=; b=qX+gRLGFRJd3ElguqkNQqQ1OshtdqoG0XuATUd/h5tKBo00u2f17T9Fniq6VztFhqv saK8XXwTdBDTw9Cai55RTVxGBbsQ1YaMMD9pR6C+3d7CQxZVvXty2cMgo7goryl4exdy gCWeipbiUZ22ewiuX1E80s2NFUlT7pLNwPPCqaD4QTD4q+PVBOUkJ99HRl440D6LiGfm MbX1iGfpZc4Xownq6lyJp6r7CNz7TxynKrN5ZMzW2BzMcDVIfKFPHpNX/lzeNO+SCP9N OIPVSonZ873YmQ+LfN+slXRRpdBgCd6YKyChvDWPgHWNFugDmv1vf8PSrtyLLtrgYPCc UnWQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XaIaaULbP3McQWHg8W+/o/1CYRBruKdNlh+486HcGCM=; b=flDqZ7uLPQvw0AM2/HWy7Iszi7Jf24Y7YGnaPdPvSK+ySM2fbGAebiAMFvOeb24BWD 2DPVFku0BjzfXlJRnLSxMElfXhYTu7ndsc+6cQWeBNMHUEbYv85uhqfI9rZBLAQnxV9l 6avnXzLcfxce2+6nlzyf1gs4KAq4g+4qvYBiCYsfwvmAnpPq32RAJyPbKk8QIl7HsQaE 0jQoUO5bYmySTzXq9a2xcxosbgBqEwU3NjlJuCREQw3RWtGG5fnzRYKgccgzzUbDAhla J/+w6oXSrQPVyi+ItmMvys+LzNF0qD+tLXkfJWMB0FINQPRMIWImIGjEg9eDJGghFOU7 K5bw== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZMyp20hDmJKJaSpmHuwN9HIAWqwwmcmYXLc4Jzz2SEgKF2vhLX nARN4rPyOkLrkF69u5N8sdzza7EZJ+CkL3bgZRbHhw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypInNZ8StO0YG491G0Qh82LO28Kdxjyb+vEZxtIJy87j+WsFkKeAnw2pshXxgw6Ns3g/B8D5t4FRjpOdDRr5uuU= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:6c4:: with SMTP id u4mr757685lff.89.1585343650678; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 14:14:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200325103956.109284-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20200325103956.109284-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> From: Linus Walleij Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 22:13:59 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1 resend] gpiolib: acpi: Add missing __init(const) markers to initcall-s To: Hans de Goede Cc: Mika Westerberg , Andy Shevchenko , Bartosz Golaszewski , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , ACPI Devel Maling List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 11:40 AM Hans de Goede wrote: > I know it has not been that long ago since I send this out, but still > I have the feeling this one seems to have fallen through the cracks? > > It has already been Acked by Mika, so if you can queue it up in > linux-gpio/for-next that would be great. It requires the fixes I just sent to Torvalds to be applied first. I simply need that stuff to be upstream before I can apply this. That is why it is deferred. Sometimes it happens that random fixes are dependent on critical fixes, then the critical fixes need to land upstream before the random fix can be applied, this is one of those cases. Yours, Linus Walleij