From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45F75C5ACAE for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 09:56:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13E6B208E4 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 09:56:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="zQWgVC5t" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730890AbfILJ4C (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Sep 2019 05:56:02 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-f196.google.com ([209.85.208.196]:42393 "EHLO mail-lj1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730872AbfILJ4A (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Sep 2019 05:56:00 -0400 Received: by mail-lj1-f196.google.com with SMTP id y23so22962405lje.9 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 02:55:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=329cG7VF2FWSqrxDIURXoF4mNurdRp+cB0ol/yD2IWM=; b=zQWgVC5tdLMykaX4/vwY9NwQnl84kGz+E6G4gmnU7E7z3xPgxUBAJuq/KLQlPf1oam RdLkgwT7ktokKveMir+dbsSJjHyajz6I6pmACAQ/vaCXqP1u+H53qJ9UGfH9Rqw4f+BS F8tIL5183K5mqiZie+gUfjKim5aKDftgnnpqvro3Rlrly4++DaglYIiO64u3PqxKyEqS vgu3cD+nTugMhX7gSo0wLYQx22Wjix5fu1vewOQSg/1dXyjPdDlBL2ZYcPZ7siq3qChf T+vLBgVhPJk/tcy3slq1OFZi3PAwqOrLAaNYWiAa1505El6PWxe3yZ95a9+Hy+PVW/Ih wamA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=329cG7VF2FWSqrxDIURXoF4mNurdRp+cB0ol/yD2IWM=; b=EweybdmTLVLnuow3FHhEnsFf0MrPpbowyvPN3rIlUr6qIGpyNE+Azrm9nZf2YXIYgj 5GN4C7sAsDk3oMhZBmU4q3VkF6ebnG50DVNftn5MobMb6ez4mmAIwfSW5sFjGuH4vLAm yz0yvk6x/4Lxccf4bhO9/JkfnFaDhuKcIwXXTqdCAUXuXT5nltqDeV39ItMa5tFM0C5I 1QtQYtB1m4D7NBhMAcPG614iJ4bP9N7oqviE5nAOZ8XY4lnBw6udzuSJuWXI0G4XjAxS a2gbtvOoILPWVzp7gjVnP5LTSnqN3if/vP0OTqvqb5fvGJW7ALewtFUqIhzmrmAOMxQF gQiw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWdkLmCMNI2Zh/EMZ4EwjEMBKSvMbmlMjiz6Yde/rjMv3NtqMAY /RhRvNcpssFf22TrEmNmkQzbwkNs+fOmQBts0YcRTw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxzzu1xektMPHWgtffW/ZJV0KpU2PYzjtvuUtd9AIHNy13c8WglMkiuJC9aHP7eR5XUK9IR4cvejz1fmBwj4RE= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a408:: with SMTP id p8mr25771055ljn.54.1568282158508; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 02:55:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190911075215.78047-1-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20190911075215.78047-1-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> From: Linus Walleij Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 10:55:47 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] Add support for software nodes to gpiolib To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: Andy Shevchenko , Mika Westerberg , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , Andrew Lunn , Andrzej Hajda , Bartosz Golaszewski , Daniel Vetter , David Airlie , "David S. Miller" , Florian Fainelli , Heiner Kallweit , Jernej Skrabec , Jonas Karlman , Laurent Pinchart , Neil Armstrong , Russell King , "open list:DRM PANEL DRIVERS" , ACPI Devel Maling List , netdev Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 8:52 AM Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > If we agree in principle, I would like to have the very first 3 patches > in an immutable branch off maybe -rc8 so that it can be pulled into > individual subsystems so that patches switching various drivers to > fwnode_gpiod_get_index() could be applied. I think it seems a bit enthusiastic to have non-GPIO subsystems pick up these changes this close to the merge window so my plan is to merge patches 1.2.3 (1 already merged) and then you could massage the other subsystems in v5.4-rc1. But if other subsystems say "hey we want do fix this in like 3 days" then I'm game for an immutable branch as well. Yours, Linus Walleij