linux-gpio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Wang <sean.wang@kernel.org>
To: Light Hsieh <light.hsieh@mediatek.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	kuohong.wang@mediatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] pinctrl: mediatek: support access registers without race-condition
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 16:11:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGp9Lzo31FPCQ5PMyA7wAgB_pGM3bZbxP84XYqL7Njb9d+w6Fw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1597739776-15944-1-git-send-email-light.hsieh@mediatek.com>

Hi Light,

On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 1:36 AM <light.hsieh@mediatek.com> wrote:
>
> From: Light Hsieh <light.hsieh@mediatek.com>
>
> Some MediaTek SOC provide more control registers other than value register.

s/MT6765/Some MediaTek SoC/

> Generanll, a value register need read-modify-write is at offset 0xXXXXXXXX0.

s/Generally/Generanll/

> A corresponding SET register is at offset 0xXXXXXXX4. Write 1s' to some bits
>   of SET register will set same bits in value register.
> A corresponding CLR register is at offset 0xXXXXXXX8. Write 1s' to some bits
>   of CLR register will clear same bits in value register.
> For GPIO mode selection, MWR register is provided at offset 0xXXXXXXXC.
>   With MWR, the MSBit of GPIO mode selection field is for modification-enable,
>   not for GPIO mode selection, and the remaining LSBits are for mode
>   selection.
>   Take mode selection field with 4-bits as example, to select mode 0~7 via
>   MWR register, 8~15 (instead of 0~7) shall be written to corresponding mode
>   selection field.
> When using SET/CLR/MWR registers, read-modify-write of value register is not
>   necessary. This can prevent from race condition when multiple bus masters
>   concurrently read-modify-write the same value register for setting different
>   fields of the same value register.
>
> Signed-off-by: Light Hsieh <light.hsieh@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.h |  2 +
>  2 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c
> index b77b18f..51f0b53 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,29 @@
>  #include "mtk-eint.h"
>  #include "pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.h"
>
> +/* Some MediaTek SOC provide more control registers other than value register.

s/MT6765/Some MediaTek SoC/

> + * Generanll, a value register need read-modify-write is at offset 0xXXXXXXXX0.

s/Generally/Generanll/

> + * A corresponding SET register is at offset 0xXXXXXXX4. Write 1s' to some bits
> + *  of SET register will set same bits in value register.
> + * A corresponding CLR register is at offset 0xXXXXXXX8. Write 1s' to some bits
> + *  of CLR register will clear same bits in value register.
> + * For GPIO mode selection, MWR register is provided at offset 0xXXXXXXXC.
> + *  With MWR, the MSBit of GPIO mode selection field is for modification-enable,
> + *  not for GPIO mode selection, and the remaining LSBits are for mode
> + *  selection.
> + *  Take mode selection field with 4-bits as example, to select mode 0~7 via
> + *  MWR register, 8~15 (instead of 0~7) shall be written to corresponding mode
> + *  selection field.
> + * When using SET/CLR/MWR registers, read-modify-write of value register is not
> + *  necessary. This can prevent from race condition when multiple bus masters
> + *  concurrently read-modify-write the same value register for setting different
> + *  fields of the same value register.
> + */
> +
> +#define SET_OFFSET 0x4
> +#define CLR_OFFSET 0x8

can set/clr offset work for mode register?

> +#define MWR_OFFSET 0xC
> +
>  /**
>   * struct mtk_drive_desc - the structure that holds the information
>   *                         of the driving current
> @@ -64,6 +87,38 @@ void mtk_rmw(struct mtk_pinctrl *pctl, u8 i, u32 reg, u32 mask, u32 set)
>         mtk_w32(pctl, i, reg, val);
>  }
>
> +
> +static void mtk_hw_set_value_race_free(struct mtk_pinctrl *pctl,
> +               struct mtk_pin_field *pf, u32 value)

s/mtk_hw_set_value_race_free/mtk_hw_w1sc/ to explictly indicate
write-one ethier set or clear operation supported by hw

> +{
> +       unsigned int set, clr;
> +
> +       set = value & pf->mask;
> +       clr = (~set) & pf->mask;
> +
> +       if (set)
> +               mtk_w32(pctl, pf->index, pf->offset + SET_OFFSET,
> +                       set << pf->bitpos);
> +       if (clr)
> +               mtk_w32(pctl, pf->index, pf->offset + CLR_OFFSET,
> +                       clr << pf->bitpos);
> +}
> +
> +static void mtk_hw_set_mode_race_free(struct mtk_pinctrl *pctl,
> +               struct mtk_pin_field *pf, u32 value)

s/mtk_hw_set_mode_race_free/mtk_hw_mwr/

> +{
> +       unsigned int value_new;
> +
> +       /* MSB of mask is modification-enable bit, set this bit */
> +       value_new = (1 << (pctl->soc->mwr_field_width - 1)) | value;

it seems to be we can use fls(pf->mask) to replace ctl->soc->mwr_field_width

> +       if (value_new == value)
> +               dev_notice(pctl->dev,
> +                       "invalid mode 0x%x, use it by ignoring MSBit!\n",
> +                       value);
> +       mtk_w32(pctl, pf->index, pf->offset + MWR_OFFSET,
> +               value_new << pf->bitpos);
> +}
> +
>  static int mtk_hw_pin_field_lookup(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw,
>                                    const struct mtk_pin_desc *desc,
>                                    int field, struct mtk_pin_field *pfd)
> @@ -197,10 +252,16 @@ int mtk_hw_set_value(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw, const struct mtk_pin_desc *desc,
>         if (value < 0 || value > pf.mask)
>                 return -EINVAL;
>
> -       if (!pf.next)
> -               mtk_rmw(hw, pf.index, pf.offset, pf.mask << pf.bitpos,
> -                       (value & pf.mask) << pf.bitpos);
> -       else
> +       if (!pf.next) {
> +               if (hw->soc->race_free_access) {

let's create an extra flags caps under hw->soc and the SoC capability
check, something like hw->soc->caps & MTK_HW_CAPS_RMW_ATOMIC to easily
extend various things for future SoC

> +                       if (field == PINCTRL_PIN_REG_MODE)
> +                               mtk_hw_set_mode_race_free(hw, &pf, value);
> +                       else
> +                               mtk_hw_set_value_race_free(hw, &pf, value);
> +               }

let's create a function holding that specific hardware stuff (at least
currently it look like), something like

static void mtk_hw_rmw(struct mtk_pinctrl *pctl,  struct mtk_pin_field *pf)
{
     if (pf->field == PINCTRL_PIN_REG_MODE) /* create a member field for pf */
            mtk_hw_mwr(...);
    else
            mtk_hw_w1sc(...);
}

> +                       mtk_rmw(hw, pf.index, pf.offset, pf.mask << pf.bitpos,
> +                               (value & pf.mask) << pf.bitpos);
> +       } else
>                 mtk_hw_write_cross_field(hw, &pf, value);
>
>         return 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.h b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.h
> index 27df087..95fb329 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.h
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.h
> @@ -203,6 +203,8 @@ struct mtk_pin_soc {
>         /* Specific parameters per SoC */
>         u8                              gpio_m;
>         bool                            ies_present;
> +       bool                            race_free_access;
> +       unsigned int                    mwr_field_width;
>         const char * const              *base_names;
>         unsigned int                    nbase_names;
>
> --
> 1.8.1.1.dirty

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-08-19 23:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-18  8:36 [PATCH v1 1/2] pinctrl: mediatek: support access registers without race-condition light.hsieh
2020-08-18  8:36 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] pinctrl: mediatek: make MediaTek MT6765 pinctrl driver support race-free register access light.hsieh
2020-08-19 23:11 ` Sean Wang [this message]
2020-08-21  4:47   ` [PATCH v1 1/2] pinctrl: mediatek: support access registers without race-condition Light Hsieh
2020-08-21  9:59     ` Sean Wang
2020-08-21 10:44       ` Light Hsieh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAGp9Lzo31FPCQ5PMyA7wAgB_pGM3bZbxP84XYqL7Njb9d+w6Fw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=sean.wang@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuohong.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=light.hsieh@mediatek.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).